Skip to main content

Development but no prosperity

Updated 19 Dec, 2021 08:42am
Rafiullah KakarPublished December 19, 2021 - Updated a day ago

The writer is a public policy and development specialist from Balochistan.

AFTER month-long protests, the ‘Gwadar Ko Haq Do’ movement has called off its sit-in, following a written commitment by the government to impose a ban on illegal trawlers, abolish unnecessary check posts, restore border trade and provide basic necessities.

One hopes that the agreement is implemented in letter and spirit. However, if history is any indication, Islamabad has a long legacy of broken promises to Balochistan. While multiple causes explain this ill-treatment, key structural drivers include the province’s insignificant political weight in the country’s majoritarian federal scheme, systemic under-representation in power structures and ruling coalitions, and Islamabad’s extractive approach towards economic development in Balochistan.

The Gwadar crisis is indeed a product of Islamabad’s extractive development model that has, over the years, not only disregarded social and political rights of the local people but also expanded in scope from exploitation of natural resources to control over land, the informal economy and water resources. Let’s examine how this approach has brought us to where we are today.

🔴Firstly, CPEC’s being launched without devising a strategy for peaceful management of the ongoing ethnic conflict was an ill-advised move that was bound to backfire. Literature on mega projects in conflict-affected regions reveals that successful economic development efforts are typically preceded by political reconciliation. Economic development amidst conflict is fraught with a number of risks.

Social development and public service delivery remain dismal in Gwadar.

a) It inevitably leads to a situation whereby the military assumes a greater role not only in security matters but also economic development interventions. This, on the one hand, increases militarisation in the region, which is bound to deepen alienation in a place like Balochistan with a history of resentment towards check posts and cantonments. On the other hand, military-driven economic interventions create issues of legitimacy and local ownership.

b) Furthermore, economic development in a highly militarised environment fosters radical politics and delegitimises moderate political voices — a phenomenon that ends up benefiting Baloch separatist elements.

c) Lastly, such an approach inadvertently puts off prospective investors and foreign governments for whom the enhanced security measures are intended.

🔴Secondly, the public discourse that projects CPEC as a ‘game-changer’ has created false and unrealistic hopes among ordinary people, who have come to view it as a panacea and substitute for domestic growth and development policies. Even today, the state, much of the media and mainstream academia are interested more in manufacturing a falsely positive picture of the reality than presenting the reality itself.

🔴Thirdly, the investments made in Gwadar over the past two decades have been targeted mainly at upgrading the port infrastructure and improving connectivity with the national highway network.Given that displacement of people and livelihoods and degradation of the environment are almost intrinsic to large infrastructure projects, an inclusive resettlement and social development framework should have been an integral part of the strategy for developing the Gwadar port. Furthermore, domestic financial resources should have been mobilised on a war-footing to ensure the provision of basic facilities to residents of Gwadar.

However, in reality, the concerns of the fishermen of Gwadar were not given due consideration at the planning and design stage, mainly because the process through which CPEC projects were finalised was centralised, opaque and non-participatory. Instead, a piecemeal approach was adopted to address minor concerns every now and then to defuse rising pressure. Similarly, the provision of basic facilities to the people of Gwadar was placed at the altar of commercially driven early-harvest projects. For example: nearly $15-18 billion were spent on energy generation during the early-harvest phase but not a penny was spent to ensure the provision of electricity to Gwadar. As a matter of fact, for all these investments in energy, the entire Makran region, including Gwadar, remained disconnected from the national grid. A project to extend the national transmission network to Makran region was approved in the federal PSDP only three years ago, but that too has seen slow implementation.

As far as provision of drinking water facilities is concerned, there is no denying that federal and provincial resources have been allocated for this purpose. Indeed, work on connecting the Swadh and Shadi Kaur dams to Gwadar city through water pipelines has been completed but long electricity shortages and a rusty, outdated and limited water transmission network have meant that even the available water couldn’t be supplied to people in their homes.

Similarly, efforts have been made to harness desalination and reverse osmosis technology to meet drinking water needs but nearly all ended in failure, thanks to the poor technical capacity of government agencies and cumbersome regulatory processes.

The bottom line is that we have ended up in a situation where security check posts and port infrastructure have expanded significantly but the state of social development and public service delivery remains dismal.

While the storm in Gwadar has subsided for the time being, it can flare up again at any time. For a durable solution to the crisis, Islamabad must shift to a more inclusive development approach that prioritises the basic rights, dignity and development needs of the local people, respects the marine ecosystem and promotes local livelihoods.

Read: Why Maulana Hidayatur Rehman has become such a prominent leader for residents of Gwadar

Such an approach may entail political reconciliation with insurgents, abolition of unnecessary check posts, making the government of Balochistan a shareholder in revenues from the port, fixing of job quotas for residents of Makran in industries planned in free zones, provision of solar home units to all Gwadar residents, upgradation of the water transmission network and the creation of a public sector company to harness the potential reverse osmosis for drinking. Furthermore, special subsidy on fuel may be announced in Gwadar district to attract more traffic via the Gwadar port. Lastly, a formal trade gateway with all allied facilities and trade logistics may be opened in each district along Balochistan’s border with Afghanistan and Iran to offset the adverse impact of fencing.

The writer is a public policy and development specialist from Balochistan.
Twitter: @rafiullahkakar

Published in Dawn, December 19th, 2021
Development but no prosperity


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

RWR Advisory: Belt and Road at a Glance

This edition covers developments from March 12 - March 26..  Belt and Road at a Glance   Subscribe to the Belt and Road Monitor Top Developments China National Machinery Industry Corporation, commonly known as Sinomach, has agreed to  build  a $845 million, 255-mile railway across  Iran , building upon a sustained period of growth for Chinese investment in Iran that accelerated after Xi Jinping’s state visit to the country in January 2016. The railway will link the cities of Tehran, Hamedan and Sanandaj. China Civil Engineering Construction, a subsidiary of CRCC, is currently also  building  a 263-km railway line from Kermanshah to Khosravi. According to Chinese entrepreneur Lin Zuoru, who  owns  factories in Iran, “Iran is at the center of everything.”On March 23, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced that foreign direct investment by Chinese companies in 50 Belt and Road countries fell by 30.9% year-on-year. While the Ministry stated that this number covers investment across al

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.