Skip to main content

Afghan retreat: why Pakistan must not agree to a US military base in Balochistan


  • A US base will be deeply unpopular in Pakistan and stress ties with its neighbours. Critically, it will produce a new generation of militants in Pakistan

Abdul Basit

Abdul Basit

Published: 


As the US withdraws from Afghanistan, its demand for a military base in Pakistan to gather intelligence on groups such as al-Qaeda and Islamic State, and to execute radar surveillance counterterrorism operations on Afghanistan, has left Pakistan in a bind.

 

Though desperate to maintain its relevance to the US post-Afghanistan, Pakistan cannot afford to alienate China, its partner in the US$62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Also, Pakistan cannot afford to antagonise the Afghan Taliban.

 

After the media leaked news of secret military base negotiations, Washington said the talks are deadlocked, while Islamabad portrayed the impasse as a “no”.

 

Yet Pakistan has a history of covertly giving military bases to the US. It denied giving the Peshawar Badaber airbase to the US in the 1960s until Russia shot down a US surveillance plane that took off from it.

It also denied giving the US the Shamsi airbase until the 2011 Nato attack in a US-led clash killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, and an unhappy Pakistan expelled US forces from Shamsi. Given this history, few are taking Pakistan’s denial seriously.

Loading video

Giving the US a military base in the southwestern Balochistan province will have far-reaching political, diplomatic and security implications for Pakistan.


But refusing may mean further diplomatic isolation from the US, more pressure through multilateral institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Action Task Force, and a shifting of the blame of US policy failures in Afghanistan on Pakistan as the principal backer of the Afghan Taliban.

Pakistan will also face a severe backlash from its public, who are highly antagonistic towards the American war in Afghanistan, and pressure from Iran, China and Russia, who all see US presence as the major cause of the forever war and a direct threat to their regional interests and national securities. 

 

China, in particular, will be highly uncomfortable with a US base in Balochistan, where most of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor projects are. The Shamsi airbase is just 400km (250 miles) from Gwadar port.

While the US presence and its counterterrorism efforts could secure China’s investments in Balochistan, Beijing is still likely to be perturbed, given US hostility towards the Belt and Road Initiative.


For Pakistan, giving the US a base would set back its efforts to broaden bilateral ties away from Afghan-centric and security-driven transactions – and pose serious security implications.


The Afghan Taliban has warned nearby countries against hosting a US military base, threatening “misfortunes and difficulties” for “those who commit such mistakes”.

 

Though Pakistan still provides sanctuary to the Taliban’s Quetta Shura and has substantial control over the insurgent group, this influence has weakened over the last few years. The Taliban’s territorial gains and diversified diplomatic ties have lessened its dependence on Pakistan.


The Afghan Taliban can easily expand its violent campaign into Pakistan through Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, better known as the Pakistani Taliban.

 

Reunified last August, the Pakistani Taliban recently carried out a high-profile suicide attack on a luxury hotel in Quetta, Balochistan’s capital.

 

After September 11, Pakistan’s decision to join the US-led war on terror attracted jihadist violence, including suicide attacks on president Pervez Musharraf.


Loading video

Drone attacks from the Shamsi airbase and strikes in the former Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) bordering Afghanistan only fuelled suicide terrorism in Pakistan.

 

Many suicide bombers were victims of drone attacks avenging family killings. Giving the US a base now will produce a new generation of militants in Pakistan – the Pakistani Taliban was a direct fallout of Pakistan’s decision to join the US war in Afghanistan and allow US troops in FATA. 

 

Finally, the decision will be a lifeline for the depleted and organisationally weakened al-Qaeda. It will use the pretext of American military presence to legitimise its militant violence in Pakistan and attract fresh recruits. It will revitalise jihadist violence directed from Afghanistan towards Pakistan.


Continued US military footprint, even limited to radar surveillance from a military base, is a recipe for perpetual conflict.

 

Instead of giving the US a military base, Pakistan should work with the US and other countries to force the Taliban to cut ties with al-Qaeda and roll back its footprint in Afghanistan.

 

Abdul Basit is a research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore. Twitter: @basitresearcher




Abdul Basit
Abdul Basit is an associate research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore

https://amp.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3136794/afghan-retreat-why-pakistan-must-not-agree-us-military-base

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

RWR Advisory: Belt and Road at a Glance

This edition covers developments from March 12 - March 26..  Belt and Road at a Glance   Subscribe to the Belt and Road Monitor Top Developments China National Machinery Industry Corporation, commonly known as Sinomach, has agreed to  build  a $845 million, 255-mile railway across  Iran , building upon a sustained period of growth for Chinese investment in Iran that accelerated after Xi Jinping’s state visit to the country in January 2016. The railway will link the cities of Tehran, Hamedan and Sanandaj. China Civil Engineering Construction, a subsidiary of CRCC, is currently also  building  a 263-km railway line from Kermanshah to Khosravi. According to Chinese entrepreneur Lin Zuoru, who  owns  factories in Iran, “Iran is at the center of everything.”On March 23, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced that foreign direct investment by Chinese companies in 50 Belt and Road countries fell by 30.9% year-on-year. While the Ministry stated that this number covers investment across al