Skip to main content

CPEC need not be a zero-sum game for the US

Rethinking relations between the United States and Pakistan is certainly not easy, given the turbulence, acrimony, and mutual recrimination which afflicts this decades long bilateral engagement. Yet, given that both countries still need each other, albeit for different reasons, necessitates identification of mutually beneficial means whereby this relationship may be made less erratic and more positive.

We have recently prepared a white paper, “Leveraging the Moment of Change: Pathways to a Sustainable US-Pakistan Relationship”, which is a consensus document signed by leading experts on Pakistan within Washington DC. This paper has put forth policy recommendations to improve bilateral ties and place them on a surer footing, without undermining the national interests of either country.

Negotiating ties between Pakistan and the US has become increasingly complex with the changing scope of US regional commitments in South Asia over the past two decades. Besides the post-9/11 US military intervention in Afghanistan placing immense strain on its relationship with Pakistan, the US has enhanced the scope of its relationship with India. Conversely, now China also has a more serious role to play in the South Asian region, especially in Pakistan, due to its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a vital part of BRI, is still being viewed with suspicion by US policymakers. The US believes CPEC will result in Pakistan becoming subjected to debt diplomacy by China while Pakistan and China have been quick to dismiss such concerns. Instead of taking a zero-sum view of CPEC, the US now needs to develop a more nuanced view of growing Chinese involvement in Pakistan.

The US must realise that Pakistan’s overreliance on CPEC is a direct outfall of its own faulty policies of trying to pressure Pakistan through punitive measures while building the capacity of India to become a strategic counterweight to China.

While US and India have increasingly shared objectives, it is nevertheless important for the US to avoid creating alarm within Pakistan as it strengthens its ties with India. Incremental US reliance on India to serve as a strategic counterweight to China creates insecurities not only in Pakistan, but also in China. It is also unclear how far India is willing to go in serve US interests in this regard. China is conciliating India in order to slow its gravitating to the US. The US can also make similar attempts to conciliate Pakistan, which in turn would help reduce Pakistan’s overreliance on China.

While it is not feasible for the US to offer Pakistan as expansive an economic partnership as China, it can offer alternative options, or even explore supplemental opportunities, which can be aligned with CPEC. The US has provided technical input to other countries such as Myanmar and Sri Lanka in assessing BRI terms and conditions and could do the same for Pakistan.

It is also possible for the US to align itself with the CPEC initiative via green technology investments. Encouraged by the US government, US green energy firms can make big gains in Pakistan, offering alternatives to the coal dependent CPEC energy portfolio. US firms have recently initiated a dozen wind energy projects in Pakistan. There are opportunities where the US government could further facilitate this process by creating a mechanism to mobilise finance for clean energy projects within Pakistan along the lines of the recently created US-India Clean Energy Finance Task Force.

In this world of multilateral engagements, it would be wise for Pakistan not to become overdependent on any single country, be it the US or China. Pakistan should explore means to lessen its overreliance on China by leveraging US support in a manner which does not sabotage its collaboration with China, but instead enables Pakistan to improve the terms of CPEC deals, to supplement CPEC projects, and/or to make these projects more efficient and eco-friendly.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 20th, 2020.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and