Skip to main content

Can Biden's new infrastructure plan rival China's Belt and Road Initiative?


For the US to seriously compete with China, infrastructure development will be an important area. China is the global leader in infrastructure; in contrast, many US transport facilities are in disrepair.
APR 15, 2021 05:50 AM

SINCE taking office, the new US Biden administration has characterised China as "the only competitor potentially capable of combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological power to mount a sustained challenge to a stable and open international system". On March 25, President Joe Biden held his first presidential press conference since taking office. He said that China would never be allowed to surpass the US as the most powerful country in the world during his term of office. He also emphasised that the US would increase investments in domestic infrastructure and key areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing and biotechnology, to ensure that the US stays ahead in the competition with China.

At the same time, to strengthen its competitive advantage against China, the Biden administration intends to enhance cooperation with allies and partners, especially Japan, Australia, Canada, the UK and the EU. Mr Biden seeks to unite US allies to contain China, and this is an indirect admission that the US alone is unable to counter the rise of China, particularly in East Asia.

For the US to seriously compete with China, infrastructure development will be an important area. In a recent telephone conversation with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Mr Biden has proposed that the US and the UK should have an initiative similar to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), bringing together democratic nations to help developing nations upgrade their infrastructure.

The BRI is the hallmark of China's emergence. Through this platform, China is rapidly extending its economic influence in Asia and other parts of the world. China's effective domestic control of Covid-19 has enhanced its leaders' confidence and the ambition to continue to promote and implement the BRI internationally.

Under the BRI framework, China's increasing influence has greatly unsettled the existing global landscape and geopolitics. The Biden administration has realised that the BRI poses challenges to US politics and its economy, national security and overseas interests.

According to official data from China, 138 nations in five continents have signed various BRI cooperation agreements with China as of the end of 2020. Since launching the BRI in 2013, China has spent some US$690 billion in overseas investments and construction contracts for BRI projects in more than 100 nations.

The BRI has attracted increasing attention from the international community. Since its reforms and opening up to the world, China has successfully transformed its economic prowess into expanding regional and global influence. The US and the world cannot ignore the potential impacts of the rise of China and the BRI implementation.

Published by the Council on Foreign Relations on March 23, the report titled China's Belt and Road: Implications for the United States recommends that the US should formulate a new strategy that can effectively counter the BRI by promoting high-quality and environmentally sustainable infrastructure development, and ensuring that companies from different nations can fairly participate in infrastructure financing and construction.

AN AMERICAN SILK ROAD VISION

The BRI seeks to connect China with the world through infrastructure, trade, investments and people-to-people exchanges. Through the BRI, China hopes to recreate the prosperous East-West trade along the ancient Silk Road, extending it geographically and expanding it to more developments. The BRI is China's starting point to building a new global landscape and a new model of global interaction.

In recent years, there has been pushback from some nations that the infrastructure projects with investments from China are costly and impractical, with issues of corruption in internal transactions. These nations have reviewed the BRI projects and requested to renegotiate their contractual terms with China to reduce project costs and scale. Mr Biden hopes to take advantage of the dissatisfaction of these nations along the BRI routes and engage them and US allies to form an alliance against the BRI.

The details of Mr Biden's new initiative to rival the BRI remain unclear. The US must convince the global community that it can provide an alternative that is superior to China's BRI in urgently upgrading the infrastructure in a vast number of developing nations. It is noteworthy, however, that US investments in many developing nations have declined and are unable to meet their needs in recent years.

According to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data, although China has become the second largest economy after the US, its per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of US$10,582 in 2020 is only one-sixth that of the US' GDP of US$63,051. As the only superpower in the world, the US still has an absolute advantage in domains such as the military, education and R&D.

However, China has the best container port, the fastest rail, the largest airport and the most complete telecommunications infrastructure in the world. It has become the global leader in infrastructure, with solid capabilities in facility construction and operations management. In contrast, many transportation facilities in the US - such as roads, bridges and airports - are in disrepair.

China's BRI infrastructure development model is country-led, through its state-owned enterprises and banks. China is globally competitive in industries such as infrastructure construction, equipment manufacturing, metallurgical building material and communications equipment.

Many developing nations urgently require investments, production capacity and technologies in these industries as they hasten the pace of industrialisation and infrastructure upgrading. By participating in the BRI, nations along the BRI routes will attract more Chinese investments in infrastructure projects, and also gain a platform for their products to enter the China market.

Through the BRI implementation, China hopes to establish a new model for global infrastructure financing and development. Being country-led is China's unique advantage in the BRI, a model not found in the US and the West. China's leaders deem private enterprises to be ill-disciplined, have the tendency to expand indiscriminately, and incapable of fulfilling China's strategic objectives. Hence they distrust them. Clearly, China's HNA Group, Alibaba Group and Wanda Group are cases in point.

In contrast to China's country-led BRI, is the Biden administration's proposed enterprise-led alternative an attractive option to developing nations that is able to rival the BRI?

The China-US competition in infrastructure development will be the litmus test for the superiority and effectiveness of China's country-led or the US's enterprise-led model for infrastructure upgrading in developing nations.

Vast capital is required for infrastructure upgrading in developing nations, and the risks are high. Private enterprises do not have the required capital and ability to undertake the associated risks. China will continue to implement and expand the BRI if the US is unable to put forward a more effective alternative. Already, Mr Biden's proposed alternative has been labelled by many Chinese netizens as "an imitation".

CHINA MUST MODIFY ITS BRI IMPLEMENTATION

China must objectively evaluate the progress and existing problems of BRI implementation in the past seven years, without arrogance or complacency. Infrastructure projects, with long development cycles and high risks, are linked to national sovereignty, economy and strategic security. Hence, more countries are wary that China is seeking to extend its influence through the BRI, and are worried about China's strategic considerations for the initiative as well as the BRI loans being a debt trap. Furthermore, the Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted many developing economies and their finances. Evidently, the implementation of some committed BRI projects can no longer continue under the original contracts.

China will face increasing challenges if it continues to promote and implement the BRI in its original form. It must modify its model in response to the new geopolitical landscape in the post-Covid-19 era.

The joint communique of the Second BRI Summit in Beijing in 2019 clearly stated that "high-quality infrastructure should be viable, affordable, accessible, inclusive and broadly beneficial over its entire life-cycle, contributing to sustainable development of participating countries and the industrialisation of developing countries".

For the BRI's sustainability, China must focus more on sustainable financing for developing nations along the BRI routes and the long-term financial impacts of loans for infrastructure projects. China's enterprises that go global must face, accept and adapt to the global standards and rules, as well as establish the principles of sustainable development and be responsible investors. To succeed, they must focus more on the economic benefits of overseas investment projects, the voices of the local communities, and environmental sustainability. A balance among these will be required to secure win-wins. THINKCHINA

  • The writer is senior research fellow at the East Asian Institute. This was translated from Mandarin by Yuen Kum Cheong.

ThinkChina is an English language e-magazine focused on China, powered by SPH flagship Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao. Follow us for big reads, opinions and columns on China at thinkchina.sg


https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion/can-bidens-new-infrastructure-plan-rival-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and