Skip to main content

Criticism of China’s Xinjiang policies grows at UN


Source: Jeremy Goldkorn | SupChina



Countries supporting China’s Xinjiang policies (red) and criticizing them (blue) in joint statements at the UN this weekGraphic via Nathan Ruser on Twitter.

For over two years, a major task for Chinese diplomats at the United Nations has been to rally support for China’s policies in Xinjiang, and respond to criticism from the U.S. and other Western countries. That high-level diplomatic war of words has continued in the past weeks, but first, here is a brief timeline of relevant events at the United Nations:

  • August 2018: The situation in Xinjiang first comes to widespread international attention when the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) receives reports from countries and civil society groups. A Reuters headline characterizes the outcome of that committee meeting this way: U.N. says it has credible reports that China holds million Uyghurs in secret camps.
  • July 2019: The ambassadors of 22 countries write to the UN Human Rights Council condemning China’s treatment of Muslim minorities. This includes Australia, Canada, Japan, and many Western European countries, but not the United States, which had quit its position on the council a year earlier. China responds with a letter signed by 37 states that expresses support for China’s ethnic policies in Xinjiang as a successful “counter-terrorism and deradicalization” program.
  • September 2019: China goes on the offensive and brings up the issue of Xinjiang, defending Beijing’s policies publicly in front of the UN Security Council for the first time.
  • October 2019: Fifty-four countries read a joint statement supporting China’s policies, and 23 countries — now including the U.S. — read a joint statement condemning “arbitrary detention” of Uyghurs and others.
  • July 2020: A group of 27 countries express concern to the UN Human Rights Council, and China rallies a group of 46 countries to push back.

Last week, more countries criticized China. Germany, on behalf of 39 countries, delivered a statement on October 6 that:

  • Said the group is “gravely concerned about the existence of a large network of ‘political re-education’ camps [in Xinjiang] where credible reports indicate that over a million people have been arbitrarily detained.”
  • Called on China “to allow immediate, meaningful and unfettered access to Xinjiang for independent observers including the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights…to urgently implement CERD’s eight recommendations related to Xinjiang, including by refraining from the arbitrary detention of Uyghurs and members of other minorities.”

  • Also expressed concern about the rights of Tibetans, and that “a number of provisions in the Hong Kong National Security Law do not conform to China’s international legal obligations.”

Separately, Turkey expressed concern about Xinjiang and the “human rights situation” in the region. Turkey’s statement is significant because of its especially large Uyghur refugee population, and because the country has wavered in recent years on how to approach the Uyghur issue.

But China rallied support from nearly 70 countries

As with previous waves of criticism, China rallied a group of countries to issue a response. Cuba, on behalf of 45 countries, read a statement “supporting China’s counter-terrorism and deradicalization measures in Xinjiang.”

China accused the “U.S., Germany, the U.K. and a few other countries” of making “groundless accusations” and “provoking confrontation among member states” in a statement by the Chinese mission to the UN.

  • “Nearly 70 countries have echoed China’s position. In support of China, Pakistan made a joint statement on behalf of 55 countries on Hong Kong, Cuba made a joint statement on behalf of 45 countries on Xinjiang, and Kuwait made a joint statement on behalf of three Gulf states. A large number of countries supported China in their national statements… There was overwhelming support for China during the meeting,” the statement claimed.

What does this all mean?

Chinese diplomats have ramped up their rhetoric another notch in defending Xinjiang policy in this latest round of UN diplomacy. This makes sense, as just last month, Chinese leader Xí Jìnpíng 习近平 publicly defended his policies in Xinjiang as “completely correct.”

What we concluded from Xi’s comments then is the same conclusion now: China appears set to totally ignore international criticism, even as the condemnations get louder and include more explicit references to genocide. However, as that criticism grows, it becomes more likely that the U.S. and its allies will boycott the Beijing 2022 Olympics. British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, for instance, has said he would not rule out such a boycott.

The question to ask now: How many of the 39 countries signing the joint statement last week will seriously consider boycotting the Olympics?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and