Skip to main content

China’s High-Security Compound at Gwadar: Should India Worry?


Recent reports indicate that China is building several new high-security complexes at the Gwadar Deep Sea Port (at western-end of Pakistan’s coastline in Balochistan). Earlier, in March 2017, Chinese military sources had spoken about deploying Navy Marines at Gwadar and Djibouti to defend Chinese interests overseas. When viewed alongside China’s overall activities in the Indian Ocean, it does seem that Beijing is likely looking at using Gwadar as a dual-use, economic hub-cum-military base.

China had first evinced interest in Gwadar in 2001 as the end point of a trade corridor connecting Kashgar (Xinjiang) to the Arabian Sea through the Karakorum Highway. The aim was to drastically reduce the trade transit costs and time between its north-western regions and markets in the Middle-East/Africa. China completed the initial development of Gwadar Port in 2006, and the same year, signed an agreement with Pakistan to upgrade the Karakorum Highway.

In January 2013, Pakistan gave control of Gwadar Port to a Chinese company, and four months later, China proposed the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a trade transit corridor between Pakistan’s coastal areas and China’s Xinjiang.

The ‘20-point Joint Statement’ (April 2015) pledged to make the CPEC an important project of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI), with Beijing investing substantially in infrastructure, power generation and dams. Gwadar Port and the Karakorum Highway upgradation were thus subsumed under the CPEC project. Both Pakistan and China visualise turning GDSP into a regional trade hub by 2023.

Also Read: Chabahar & Gwadar: India and Pakistan’s Regional Power Struggle

An Economic Issue Turned into a Military Problem

China’s export-orientated economy is critically dependant on unfettered movement of resources and goods across seas. But with its maritime traffic through the Indian Ocean vulnerable to interdiction, the economic issue has turned into a military problem, compelling China to look for:

  • Overland routes for resource-access and trade. The BRI, CPEC, and its oil/gas pipelines are examples of that.
  • Opportunities to deploy its Navy in the Indian Ocean.
  • A base to servicing its naval elements.

Deployment of Chinese Navy in Indian Ocean

China’s ‘Naval Development Plan’, laid-out by Admiral Liu Huaqing in the 1980s, had envisioned its Navy venturing into the Indian Ocean from 2010 onwards to first gather operating information, and then entering in strength by 2020.

The UN resolutions of 2008 on piracy provided China a perfect cover to establish a naval presence in the Indian Ocean without adverse international fallout – January 2009 saw the deployment of the PLA Navy’s Anti-Piracy Task Force off the coast of Somalia. This Task Force continues to maintain a presence there. Further, from February 2014, China’s nuclear-powered and conventional submarines also commenced sorties into the Indian Ocean, with stops at Karachi or Colombo enroute. China’s assistance to Pakistan in the construction of a Very Low Frequency (VLF) facility at Turbat (north of Gwadar) for communications with strategic submarines assumes significance in this context.

Also Read: US Warning Over CPEC: What’s the Reality of China-Pakistan Ties?

China’s Quest for a Naval Base in the Indian Ocean

China does need some sort of permanent basing to sustain its operations in the Indian Ocean, especially with India objecting to PLA submarines docking at Colombo. Its first military base on foreign soil at Djibouti, established in 2017, is however adjacent to the bases of seven foreign militaries including the US. Hence, it serves only as a ‘logistical facility’ for operations associated with anti-piracy, humanitarian assistance & disaster relief.

There have thus been conjecture about China establishing a military base in countries where it has developed port infrastructure under its ‘String of Pearls’ (e.g. Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, the Maldives). These conjectures however directly extrapolate the US model of military basing. The powerful US military has the bandwidth to defend its bases worldwide - whereas the PLA Navy yet does not have such a force structure. Besides, in India’s neighbourhood, the Indian military, operating off the Indian landmass, holds the home advantage.

In the absence of this capability, China needs a country that is a strategic ally, is inimical to India, has a strong military, and can contribute to the defence of the Chinese base.

Pakistan, a client-state, and Gwadar, located at the furthest end of Pakistan, fit this requirement ideally.

Presence of Chinese Assets at Pakistani Ports Could Inhibit Indian Plans

A 2014 analysis by the US’s National Defence University entitled ‘Chinese Overseas Basing Requirements in the 21st Century’ had highlighted that ‘Dual-Use Logistics Facilities’ best suit Chinese policies, with trusted ally Pakistan being the ideal location for a military base. Gwadar fully fits this description. This analysis is backed by Chinese commentaries on establishment of ‘Overseas Strategic Support Bases’, which espouse a “fully functional base… in Pakistan”.

A Chinese naval base at Gwadar will increase India’s operational dilemma.

China will have a readily available naval force in the Indian Ocean, albeit small-sized. The presence of Chinese assets at Pakistani ports could inhibit Indian plans, just as US military presence at Pakistani bases post-9/11 had complicated its plans after the 13 December 2001 attack on our Parliament.

Gwadar Port: A ‘Commercial’ Venture or a ‘Colonising’ One?

A Chinese naval presence at Gwadar, which is located at the mouth of the Gulf of Oman, will also allow it :

  • to monitor ship traffic from/to the Persian Gulf as well as the movement of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet (part of the US’ Central Command; headquartered at Bahrain)
  • protect its own maritime traffic while being in a position to interdict similar vessels of adversaries.

Gwadar Port has witnessed sparse maritime traffic since opening in 2007. While China continues to plug Gwadar as a commercial venture, it is increasingly looking like a coaling station the British built in their colonisation ventures. With China already maintaining an average of six-to-seven naval ships in the Indian Ocean, and its media hinting at the deployment of an aircraft carrier in near future, it does seem that China is gearing up to use Gwadar also as a military base in the times to come.

(Kuldip Singh is a retired Brigadier of the Indian Army. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

Historical relationship between Kurd and Baloch.

The Kurds are the ethnical group living in a region known as Kurdistan which is divided into Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran. They  are struggling for an independent region since decades and they are famous for their female guerrilla fighters.        On 25 September 2017, the referendum for an independent Kurdish region  was held in Iraq with a turn out of 72 %.   On this important occasion, the historical relation between Kurd and Baloch people is worth discussing.       When it comes to history, every nation tends to find its roots and origin. Same goes with the Baloch people. The Baloch people are always curious  about  finding their roots in history. Even if you  talk to a shepherd in Balochistan, he will be curious to talk about his  tribal or ethnical roots.      The Balochs have always conveyed the history to the next generations in different mediums like poems etc. No Baloch before 20th century had written books on  history  or origin of the Baloch nation .