Skip to main content

Sell more to China

The beginning of the year 2020 marks a new turn in China-Pakistan economic relations, with the operationalisation of the second phase of the China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement (CPFTA-II). The agreement has immediately abolished tariffs for Pakistan on 313 products, while a total of 75% of the tariff lines will be liberalised over the next decade. This will significantly improve access to the Chinese market for Pakistani exports. A wide variety of products are covered under these concessional tariffs including textiles, garments, seafood, meat, leather, chemicals, plastics and footwear. In addition, the FTA has improved safeguard mechanisms for protection of the domestic industry in Pakistan, introduced a safety valve against future balance of payment crises, and included enforcement of electronic data exchange to avoid mis-declaration and under-invoicing of imports from China.

Pakistan is an exports-starved country, running huge trade and current account deficits that in turn have pushed it to repeatedly seek IMF bailouts. Trade deficit with China alone contributed 34% to Pakistan’s overall trade deficit in 2018-19 and was equivalent to 78% of the country’s current account deficit. Now the world’s largest import market, which happens to share a border with us, has provided us competitive access to the majority of its two trillion dollar export market. Shouldn’t this be a game changer for Pakistan? The candid answer is “it depends”.

Let’s first look at what happened with the first phase of Pak-China Free Trade Agreement that was signed in 2006. The exports to China did increase thereafter, but not as much as the imports, leading to Pakistan’s swelling trade deficit with China.

Was it a badly negotiated agreement? Well, it could have been negotiated better. For instance, only one product from Pakistan’s top 20 garment exports was given category-1 concession with 0% tariff, whereas none of Pakistan’s top exports was covered under category-2, with tariffs of 0-5% in five years.

But that was not the only problem. The FTA did offer 0% tariff on 35% of the products in five years. Yet by 2012, Pakistan’s exports to China concentrated only on 6% of the products enjoying 0% tariff, depicting marginal use of this competitive access owing to a narrow export base. Moreover, soon after the FTA was signed, the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area was created, granting much more lucrative concessions to ASEAN countries, thereby eroding Pakistan’s comparative advantage. Lastly, the non-tariff barriers also prevented exports in many categories.

While the CPFTA-II is much better negotiated, without substantial domestic efforts many of the granted concessions will at best result in export diversion rather than an absolute export increase. What we need is an increase in manufacturing capacity, coupled with enhanced competitiveness, trade facilitation and information dissemination. In many cases, the non-tariff barriers would have to be worked out as well. Besides new capacity, we also need to aim for export sophistication, moving on to higher value-added products. Moreover, the free trade agreement should not be looked at in isolation and rather in conjunction with the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Not only has CPEC improved connectivity with China, but the special economic zones, under the CPEC, should also be used to attract investment in targeted sectors and products for which the FTA is expected to boost demand.

The private sector also has to play its part. Building a new market requires exploring new customers, investing in research and development, overcoming language barriers and making new partnerships. With entrepreneurs as trailblazers, the government should follow the private sector’s lead and address technical barriers to trade in promising areas.

If we are serious about benefitting from the FTA and CPEC, the industrial, trade and investment policies should all have a single focus: how we can sell more to China.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th, 2020.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and