Skip to main content

Dignity in foreign relations


Muhammad Amir RanaAugust 25, 2019

The writer is a security analyst.

THE desire for dignity, self-esteem and appreciation motivates humans and nations alike, significantly impacting their behaviours. This desire partially originates from a fear of humiliation. Dignity is capital that a nation earns through a cultured polity, strong economy, and its geographical and strategic strengths. Eventually, it determines the friends and foes of a nation.

Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s statement on the silence of the Muslim ‘ummah’ over India’s oppression of Kashmir reflects that Pakistan lacks some essential component to develop equal and robust bilateral relations with other nations. Fed with the narratives of the ummah and Muslim brotherhood since the country was founded, many in Pakistan wonder why the ummah only showed solidarity with their country when it was internally and strategically strong. It also vindicates the view that religion and ideologies do not provide any foundation for strong relations among nations. In reality, these remain secondary, and largely come into play when aligned with national interests of economic and strategic significance.

Read: Any permanent member can create hurdles for Pakistan at UNSC: FM

When so-called friends do not stand with Pakistan in its hour of need, it hurts, and many Pakistanis feel humiliated. In this age of a growing identity politics, populism is not only confined to domestic political contexts, but also factors in an identification of friends and foes in international politics. Francis Fukuyama, in his recent book Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, contextualises contemporary identity politics by explaining three parts of the human soul. The first is about primitive desires, such as thirst or hunger. “The second is more rational – like the voice that tells us to avoid rotten meat even when we’re hungry. But independent of these is a third part, thymos, which yearns for dignity and recognition from other people.” He argues that identity politics is rooted in thymos because it revolves around a particular group’s fight for dignity and recognition.

ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD

Does Pakistan need to do some soul-searching to re-evaluate its friends and foes? Perhaps it is high time for us to rid ourselves of the illusion of a united Muslim world. One international wire service report provided a rationale behind Gulf countries’ muted response over India-held Kashmir. These countries have more than $100 billion in annual trade with India, making it a prized economic partner. In contrast, Pakistan has lost its economic balance with its Arab allies; rather, it looks to them for bailouts whenever its economy is in a crisis. A dignified relationship with Gulf countries will remain a dream unless Pakistan’s economy and self-esteem recover.

Does Pakistan need to do some soul-searching to re-evaluate its friends and foes?


Pakistan’s relationship with the Arabs and Iran has never been easy. To influence Pakistani state and society, both have been managing their sectarian proxies in the country, which contributes towards making the militant landscape even more volatile. Pakistan’s reliance on the Arab world started when Zulfikar Ali Bhutto changed its foreign policy alignment from Cento-centric to Arab-focused. The Shah of Iran had then warned Bhutto that these relationships would not prove strategically worthy. The Shah also boycotted the International Islamic Summit held in Lahore in 1974. Still, he helped Pakistan in the aftermath of 1971, which Bhutto used as an opportunity for realignment with the Arab world.

Alex Vatanka, an expert on Iranian affairs, provides fabulous accounts on this in his book Iran and Pakistan: Security, Diplomacy and American Influence, and describes how the Lahore summit had weakened Pakistan-Iran relations, despite the fact that the Shah dispatched his foreign minister to Lahore on Bhutto’s insistence. The realignment paid off for Pakistan. Before 1974, Islamabad did not receive direct financial aid from any Arab country. Bhutto changed that, and Arab oil money began to flow.

However, after the regime change in Iran and military coup in Pakistan, things quickly changed. The West’s reliance on its Arab friends increased to sustain peace in the Middle East and to partner in Afghanistan to defeat the Soviet Union. Pakistan changed its policy direction as well for its own geopolitical reasons. While contexts have changed now, Pakistan’s growing reliance on Arabs for deferred oil payments and bailouts hurts its equity in relations with them.

The support for Kashmiris and Pakistan has come from three corners. First, from the international media and human rights organisations, which are highlighting the issue and building diplomatic pressure on India. Second, from China, which has helped to make the United Nations Security Council take notice of the issue. And third, from the US that is constantly offering mediation, which is irritating India. Turkey and Malaysia’s responses were also adequate.

Read: China to 'uphold justice for Pakistan' on Kashmir issue

The rationale and politics behind these responses are not difficult to understand. The US needs Pakistan in Afghanistan, and China is one of the parties to the Kashmir dispute. China may also have concerns in the context of CPEC and the Belt and Road Initiative, as the Kashmir issue has disturbed the regional political landscape, which is not a good sign for economic connectivity.

Historically, both the US and China have remained a significant pillar of Pakistan’s external relations, and Pakistan has managed ties with both at functional levels, and extracted advantages. Perhaps Pakistan needs the same balance between the two, as China’s investment is crucial for Pakistan apart from sharing with it strategic and political interests. The relationship with the US is crucial, not only for economy and strategic interests but also for its global image. Pakistan’s image determines the level of dignity and respect it holds among nations.

It may be difficult for Pakistan to develop a new geostrategic partnership with Iran in a contemporary context. But geo-economic connectivity with Iran in partnership with China can help Pakistan balance its ties between Gulf countries and Iran, and will help improve its image within regional Muslim countries.

However, major fundamentals of earning dignity in the global community are domestic, and these entail continued cooperation with the global community in its efforts to counter terrorism and extremism, and achieve peace in Afghanistan. The militants hurt the thymos of Pakistan the most, and they must not be allowed to come back.

The writer is a security analyst.

Published in Dawn, August 25th, 2019





https://www.dawn.com/news/1501527

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…