Skip to main content

China’s belt and road initiative needs more oversight to prevent corruption and abuse

The Denver Post



Nanda: China’s belt and road initiative needs more oversight to prevent corruption and abuse

Bay Ismoyo/ Getty Images

This photograph taken on November 2, 2017, shows the construction of a toll road from Jakarta to Lido, the planned location for a theme park linked to companies with business interests tied to US President Donald Trump, in West Java province. A billion-dollar Indonesian real estate development with ties to Donald Trump has become the latest project in China’s globe-spanning Belt and Road infrastructure project — just as Washington and Beijing are tussling over trade. A subsidiary of Chinese state-owned construction firm Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC) signed a deal with Indonesia’s MNC Land to build a theme park outside Jakarta as part of the ambitious project, the company said in a statement on May 10, 2018.

By VED NANDA | Columnist for The Denver Post

August 23, 2019 at 12:01 pm


Critics contend that China’s massive belt and road initiative (BRI), a grand geopolitical strategy, is designed to enhance its global presence and political and economic influence, but China claims that BRI is purely an investment and infrastructure development project aimed at improving regional cooperation and connectivity, a win-win for both China and its BRI partners. In fact, it is both.

President Xi Jinping proposed the initiative in 2013 as a new “Silk Road.” More than 70 countries are involved and, with China’s over $1 trillion investment, the project’s scope is huge. The “belt” refers to a transcontinental trade route linking China by land with the rest of Asia, Russia, and Europe, while the “road” is a sea route connecting China with South and Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Eastern Africa, and Europe.

The BRI encompasses more than four billion people with cumulative GDP around $21 trillion. It appeals to developing countries desperately needing infrastructure development — roads, railways, ports, and pipelines — as it fills the void left by international financial institutions, which no longer favor funding hard infrastructure projects.

The BRI faces mounting skepticism and criticism. Its track record has been uneven as problems have mounted. Problems include unsustainable borrowing, lack of oversight and transparency, heavy reliance on imported Chinese labor, corruption, high-interest rates, risk of cost inflation, and poor compliance with international environmental and labor standards. The Center for Global Governance has listed eight countries at risk of debt distress, including, among others, the Maldives, Djibouti, Pakistan, and Mongolia. Many developing countries have fallen into a debt trap — they accuse China of having engaged in predatory lending and they are unable to pay the money borrowed from China. Some of them, including Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Maldives, and Myanmar, have revised the deals they originally signed.

To cite a few examples, Sri Lanka’s experience with borrowing heavily to build a new port resulted in its inability to repay the loans and the country was compelled to give a 99-year lease to a state-owned Chinese company to secure debt relief. Pakistan’s ongoing debt problems forced it to cut back the planned work on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, an ambitious $62 billion project. Similarly, Myanmar had to scale back a port deal its previous regime had signed, as did the Malaysian government by trimming a rail project by one-third to $11 billion. Two months ago, a Kenyan court halted the construction of a Chinese-backed power plant, ordering a new environmental impact assessment.

Two studies last month — one by the World Bank and the other by the Asia Society Policy Institute — recommended changes to ensure that the BRI is sustainable and results in beneficial economic, environmental, and social outcomes. Recommendations include: improve transparency and oversight, safeguard against corruption, and comply with international environmental and labor standards. China has indicated that it will undertake reforms for the BRI’s sustainability.

The rest of the world has taken notice. The United States is highly concerned with the security aspects of China’s focus on strategically sensitive ports and its development of a military base in Djibouti, and the U.S. Senate last year passed a bill to create an agency that would invest $60 billion in developing countries. The U.S. trade wars and the inward shift of U.S. foreign policy are among the reasons for China’s growing influence with developing countries.

Japan is investing a $200 billion “partnership to build infrastructure and promote connectivity across the region.” Last year, the European Union announced its own “connectivity strategy” to link Europe and Asia. And India has announced a policy to counter China’s growing influence in its backyard by improving connectivity and relationship with its neighbors to the East including ASEAN countries. It has also invested heavily in Afghanistan. India and Japan have joined hands to develop a container terminal at the Colombo port in collaboration with Sri Lanka.

Nevertheless, with China’s economy slowing down and a decline in its lending in the future, the BRI remains a work in progress.

Ved Nanda is Distinguished University Professor and Director of the Ved Nanda Center for International Law at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. His column appears the last Sunday of each month and he welcomes comments at


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and