Skip to main content

Gulf and Af-Pak fast changing: India has to gear up

July 15, 2019, 12:58 PM IST Economic Times in ET Commentary

By Prasad Nallapati

We are witnessing fast moving changes in the Gulf and Af-Pak area. Emerging geo-politics have set in motion headwinds for India, warranting quick and imaginative diplomatic maneuvers to keep itself unaffected.

No one wants another major war in the Gulf. However, what the Trump administration and its allies seem to aim at is a simmering blaze that keeps Iran burning slowly but surely, unless their demands are met. He sent `sugar-coated’ messages to Ayatollahs that he could be their best friend who can make Iran great again, if they agree to re-negotiate the nuclear accord on his terms.

The US has unilaterally withdrawn from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) demanding Tehran to re-negotiate the agreement so as to permanently cripple its nuclear and missile capabilities. His administration has imposed unprecedented sanctions, even on its supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, as part of the policy of “extreme pressure”. Adding insult to injury, they declared that its Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who was the chief negotiator for the JCPOA, to be the next in line to be sanctioned.

As the European signatories of the agreement are not showing any urgency to make good their promises to offer relief from sanctions, hardliners in Iran have opted to hike up the situation to pressure them to act fast. They breached the JCPOA limits of 300 kgs and 3.67 per cent of uranium enrichment with more steps in the offing if the European powers do not act within sixty days. Shipping liners are caught in cross fire with Saudi vessels coming under attack in Emirati ports and Iran trying to seize a British tanker in the Straits of Hormuz in retaliation for the UK seizing an Iranian tanker in the Mediterranean Sea.

Marine General Joseph Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, announced efforts to form a military coalition in two weeks to ensure freedom of navigation in the Straits of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab. It is going to be really a test for American allies to join the coalition as European partners oppose Trump’s actions against the JCPOA and the Gulf powers do not want to be dragged into a war, despite being prime backers of the American punch against Iran. However, they may have little choice but to join the military coalition as Trump had already declared that the US is not going to do others’ bidding.

Efforts by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, French President Emmanuel Macron and emissaries from Qatar/Oman have apparently not gone down well. Macron is making his last-ditch efforts to convince Iran abide by the JCPOA but there are no signs of his having any aces up his sleeve. Britain, another signatory to the JCPOA, has almost declared a war on Iran by seizing its oil tanker.

The Ayatollah regime has never bowed to any pressures and demands in its forty years of rule of the Islamic republic and it is hard to imagine that it will be any different now, despite the hardships. Iran faced a long drawn out war with Iraq, backed by the GCC countries and the US. It faced sanctions for much of the past forty years. Many efforts to change the regime did not succeed. The current moves against Iran are therefore a continuation of the effort that began in 1979 to dismantle the clerical regime that came to power overthrowing pro-American Shah.

With neither the Ayatollah regime nor the Trump administration willing to step back, what we have is a simmering blaze that keeps the region unstable for a long time to come. Shipping is going to be unsafe and expensive, despite US-led coalition maintaining freedom of sea passage, with its own consequences.

Indian strategic interests are perhaps the worst affected by the American policies toward Iran and Afghanistan. New Delhi is in no position to resist the American demand of zeroing its oil imports from Iran, drawing the ire of Tehran. India also had to scale down its efforts to develop the Chahbahar port as there are no takers for using the facilities nor operating logistics as the sword of sanctions hanging above. It is doubtful if India gets an extension of exemption on the port activities. Trump is already pitching for a battle against India over trade issues, and latter’s S-400 missile deal with Russia will only complicate Indo-US relations.

The White House’s eagerness to have a quick deal with the Taliban to pull out of Afghanistan and to embrace Pakistan to facilitate the process have other dimensions that are not yet apparent for casual observers.

Gen. Mark Milley, President Trump’s nominee to be the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the US needs to maintain strong military-to-military ties with Pakistan based on shared interests of the two countries. Speaking at a confirmation hearing last week at the Senate Armed Services Committee, he said “While we have suspended security assistance and paused major defence dialogues, we need to maintain strong military-to- military ties based on our shared interests.”

He further pointed out that President Trump’s South Asia strategy recognized Pakistan as “a key partner in achieving US interests in South Asia, including developing a political settlement in Afghanistan; defeating Al Qaeda and ISIS-Khorasan; providing logistical access for US forces; and enhancing regional stability”.

This is perhaps a clear hint of US plans for a larger role for Pakistan army in regional stability rather than simply facilitating American military withdrawal from Afghanistan. It is obvious that the US is concerned about regional stability in the Gulf and Iran, in particular, and not so much South Asia. The US has earlier used Pakistan army’s assistance for “logistical access” not only to Afghanistan, but also to Iran.

The Pentagon and the CIA were earlier reported to have carried out cross-border operations from Pakistan’s Baluchistan territory to destabilize Iran’s clerical regime. If the US wants to revive them, It serves American objectives very well to keep the Ayatollah regime shaky, in addition to the pain from sanctions.

It may not be a coincidence that the Trump administration declared the Baluchistan Liberation Army as a Terrorist organization earlier this month. This has long been the demand of the Pakistan’s army.

While none of these American geo-political objectives are directed against India, they will have serious implications for Indian interests.

Any peace agreement that is acceptable to Afghans is a welcome move. However, the fact that the duo – China and Pakistan – will be the underwriters of the accord does not portend well. There is a big question mark on the future of Indian investments and protection of its interests both in Afghanistan and Iran. Its geo-strategic plans are in disarray and need course correction.

India’s support base in the US remains strong and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s charm offensive still works well with Russia and China. A few trade concessions critical to the US do not do us any harm. Continued military purchases from Moscow and diplomatic silence on the core concern of Beijing, the Dalai Lama, should keep us in good stead. It is inevitable to re-calibrate our expectations from Iran and Afghanistan as a tactical measure and wait for right opportunities.

(Prasad Nallapati is the President of the Hyderabad-based Centre for Asia-Africa Policy Research, and former Additional Secretary to the Govt of India)


https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/blogs/et-commentary/gulf-and-af-pak-fast-changing-india-has-to-gear-up/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…

Guardians of the Belt and Road

Guardians of the Belt and RoadThe internationalization of China's private security companiesby Helena Legarda and Meia NouwensFollowing the build-up of infrastructure and investment projects along China’s extensive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), private security companies from China are also increasingly going global – to protect Chinese assets and the growing number of Chinese nationals living and working in countries along the BRI, in sometimes unstable regions. Out of the 5,000 registered Chinese private security companies, 20 provide international services, employing 3,200 security personnel in countries like Iraq, Sudan and Pakistan.The impact of this newly developing Chinese activity abroad is analyzed in this MERICS China Monitor. Chinese private security companies’ international activities pose a challenge to European interests as they are often largely unregulated and their security staff are often inexperienced in dealing with serious conflict situations and combat. EU …