Skip to main content

How Pak army uses media to spin narrative


Major Akshat Upadhyay 

The most effective instrument used by the Pakistan army in this regard has been its Directorate General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG-ISPR), which seeks to influence the behaviour of the general population through manipulation of television, print and social media.

Posted at: Jun 7, 2019, 6:49 AM
Last updated: Jun 7, 2019, 6:49 AM (IST)

Audacious: Pakistan army manipulates the media to show itself in a good light.

Major Akshat Upadhyay
Defence commentator 

Asuccessful democracy is an interconnected system of rule of law, accountability, equal political rights and civil liberties. Those systems where these regimes do not function properly are classified as defective democracies. One of the major reasons for this is the existence of a powerful institution (the Pakistan army, in the case of Pakistan) that has a disproportionate influence on decision-making in certain issues, curbing the legitimacy of the democratically elected authorities.  

The Pakistani army has mastered a number of ways by which influence of the army and the deep state has been internalised. It does this through efficient media manipulation. The most effective instrument used by the army in this regard has been its Directorate General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG-ISPR), which seeks to influence the behaviour of the general population through manipulation of television, print and social media.

 The ISPR has evolved into a huge media arm of the Pakistan armed forces with a large bureaucracy over the 70 years of its existence. The roles of the ISPR and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) overlap in some cases, especially when it comes to subjugating voices critical of the army. For example, in January 2017, five bloggers writing on the persecution of minorities and human rights disappeared in the span of one week. Before their disappearance, a robust campaign was launched on television and social media, portraying them as anti-Pakistan and anti-Islam, especially by channels close to the army. 

The ISPR was used by Lt Gen Asim Bajwa to idolise Gen Raheel Sharif’s role in eradicating militancy through Operation Zarb-e-Azb, so that in January 2016 posters appeared in Karachi and Islamabad, suggesting extension of the Army chief’s tenure. When Gen Qamar Bajwa became the chief, he reverted to the practice of a Major General heading the ISPR. Under Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor, the ISPR, through Twitter, has increased its coverage of the COAS and pushed themes related to the army’s revisionist stance on Kashmir and Afghanistan and its primacy over Pakistan’s elected government. The SPR has tweeted on many foreign policy issues, such as enhancing connectivity projects in Balochistan under the garb of ‘Khushhal Balochistan’, reiterating the COAS’s aim to protect the integrity of Saudi Arabia, officially endorsing violence in Jammu and Kashmir by promoting songs such as ‘Sangbaaz’ (stone-pelter) and pre-empting the civilian government from intervening in the CPEC negotiations by tweeting about the COAS’s resolve to push through the completion of the CPEC at any cost. These subject matters form an exclusive purview of the elected government and hardly come into the ambit of the armed forces.

 In the annual 202nd Corps Commanders' Conference (CCC), the COAS and his corps commanders reviewed the Panama Papers case, a massive leak of around 11.5 million documents which also mentioned the name of the then Pakistan PM, Nawaz Sharif, for money-laundering and having unaccounted monies abroad. In a tweet, the ISPR mentioned that the COAS had deputed members of the military to sit on the Joint Investigation Team, again a systemic anomaly wherein a sitting PM was investigated by members of the military intelligence.

 However, the ISPR’s tweet on the Dawn Leaks case can be considered as the most audacious, wherein The Dawn, a reputed Pakistani newspaper, published a report titled ‘Exclusive: Act against militants or face international isolation, civilians tell military’ on October 6, 2016. In this, minutes of a meeting between the then DG-ISI, Lt Gen Rizwan Akhtar, PM Nawaz Sharif, the PM’s brother and Chief Minister of Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif, and the national security advisor, Naseer Janjua, were leaked. These minutes referred to two controversial decisions taken by the PM. The first one was that military-led intelligence agencies would not interfere if law-enforcement agencies acted against banned militant groups, and second, to conclude the Pathankot investigations and restart the stalled Mumbai attacks trials. The then COAS, Gen Raheel Sharif, visited the PM on October 10, 2016, while terming the leak a ‘national security issue’. On November 7, 2016, the government constituted a commission for an investigation into the controversial report. However, the report’s contents were leaked and aired on various news channels. The government published an official notification dated April 29, 2017 in which it recommended that the role of the daily Dawn and Cyril Almeida be referred to the All-Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) for necessary disciplinary action. The DG-ISPR’s response was very brief. It rejected the government notification in a single and terse tweet. This tweet is significant because just after this the Pakistani government had to issue a clarification that no formal notification had yet been issued in the Dawn Leaks case. 

During the Islamabad sit-in of November, 2017, the ISPR in a tweet on November 25, 2017, declared that the COAS had ‘advised’ the PM to ‘handle the Islamabad dharna peacefully’. The government requested the army for help after it found that the situation was getting out of control of the local law-enforcement agencies. The army put forth a series of requests that had to be fulfilled before it could be deployed. The government ultimately caved in to the demands of the protestors and their leader thanked the army chief for his ‘special efforts’.  

The Pakistani army, through the DG-ISPR’s official and fake Twitter accounts, completely dominates the Pakistani media. Its Twitter expositions have a two-fold effect. On the one hand, it ensures zero criticism of the army, and on the other, by showcasing its activities in the domestic and foreign policy domain, it maintains the predominance of the army or the deep state. The ISPR tweets spin the narrative of an omnipotent army, which habitually disobeys, disregards and dictates policies to the civil government. By showing the politicians in a negative light, it helps perpetuate the myth of the supremacy of the armed forces and strengthens their hold in the imagination of the public. 









https://www.tribuneindia.com/mobi/news/comment/how-pak-army-uses-media-to-spin-narrative/784214.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…