Skip to main content

Greener Power Projects for the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI)

April 22, 2019Han Chen 

This post was co-written with Jessica Norris, Lily Hartzell and Feng Xiaochang

China is hosting its second Belt and Road forum in Beijing from April 25-27, convening high-level representatives from around the world. The event will be a chance for China to evaluate the first five years of President Xi Jinping’s signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a trillion-dollar international investment project, and provide more specific targets and roadmaps for future projects.


Source: UN Environment Management Group


In the lead-up to the first Belt and Road forum in May 2017, China published its “Guidance on Promoting Green Belt and Road,” “Belt and Road Ecological and Environmental Cooperation Plan,” and “Vision and Actions on Energy Cooperation in Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road,” emphasizing that its investment projects will be used to promote the Paris Agreement and 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and are motivated by the need to “share the ecological civilization philosophy and achieve sustainable development.”

Meanwhile, energy demand in Belt and Road countries is expected to grow. As pointed out in a recent NRDC report, based on BRI countries’ targets for renewable energy, the projected installed capacity of renewable energy for 38 countries in BRI could reach 644 GW from 2020-2030, and total investment in wind and solar power could reach $644 billion. However, currently renewable energy cooperation in BRI countries faces myriad challenges, including financing difficulties, low electricity pricing, and inadequate policy support, all of which have become major obstacles for BRI renewable energy development. One measure of success for promoting a Green Belt and Road should be the extent to which BRI helps countries increase access to low-carbon energy sources (as opposed to high-carbon energy sources).

Despite official policy, BRI has come under continued criticism for promoting dependence on fossil fuelsin developing nations and investing in environmentally damaging infrastructure projects. While China has provided some financing for renewables projects overseas, including in Belt and Road countries, it is a small share compared to the percentage for other areas such as oil, gas and coal. According to a recent report by WRI and Boston University, out of the loans in the energy sector for BRI, 43 percent of state policy bank loans by the China Development Bank and Export Import Bank of China have gone to oil, gas and petrochemicals, 18 percent to coal, but only 3.4 percent to solar and 2.9 percent to wind from 2014-2017. Coal power, nuclear power and hydropower loans combined are almost seven times more than loans to solar and wind. In contrast, of the World Bank’s active energy loans, 25 percent are devoted to renewable energy (excluding large hydro and mixed renewable/fossil fuel projects).

Additionally, Chinese companies’ direct overseas greenfield investments and acquisitions in the power sector (as opposed to loans) in BRI countries from 2015-2017 included only USD$5.5 billion for wind, USD$7 billion for solar, but about USD$33.5 billion for coal, oil, and gas-fired power plants (with coal being the majority).

Fortunately, there is a huge window of opportunity to increase investments in renewable energy through BRI. Some notable examples of Chinese involvement in overseas renewables projects include:

The Sweihan Photovoltaic Project, jointly developed by China’s JinkoSolar and Japan’s Marubeni in Abu Dhabi, UAE, which includes a 25 year power purchase agreement (PPA) with the Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity Authority;Sinomatch and General Electric’s cooperation on a 102 MW wind power demonstration project in Kapedo, Kenya;Chinese financing and construction of the 300 MW Cauchari Solar PV plant in Argentina (discussed in further detail below).The acquisition of an 80% stake in the German Meerwind offshore wind farm by the Three Gorges Group;The Silk Road Fund’s purchase of shares in a Shanghai Electric and Saudi ACWA concentrated solar power project; andChina General Certification Center’s promotion of a mutual recognition system for international standards for new energy based on wind and solar.

The rest of this blog compiles data from NRDC’s own database as well as other sources to show the extent of China’s engagement with BRI countries and others on renewable energy projects in solar, wind and storage. This engagement could be in the form of loans to support specific renewables projects, acquisitions and equity investments by Chinese companies overseas, Chinese engineering, procurement and construction (EPC), or the export of Chinese solar or wind equipment overseas. There are many ways in which China has engaged in renewables projects overseas, and there is overlap in categories as projects with Chinese financers often have Chinese EPC firms and equipment suppliers. While the data below is not comprehensive, it is a first attempt to show the current trends.


When examining China’s investment in energy projects abroad it is helpful to look at the differences in lending between the Chinese state policy institutions and Chinese commercial institutions. State policy institutions include China Export and Credit Insurance Cooperation (Sinosure), China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China. These institutions provide financial support for projects that are supported by Chinese government policy. Commercial banks include the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), Bank of China (BOC), and more. These banks, while they may be partially state owned, make lending decisions in a more traditional manner.

Source: NRDC

In the last six years, the bulk of finance for individual projects has gone towards coal. State policy institutions in particular have focused on coal, and it is the only energy source where financing from state policy banks surpasses commercial investment. While wind and solar have both received support through project loans, financing for coal easily dwarfs support for renewables. We have argued before that coal is an unsafe, unsustainable investment. Renewables are already competitive with coal plants in many countries, and more and more coal investments may become “stranded assets,” which are as disastrous financially for investors as they are environmentally for local communities. Coal’s questionable financial future, combined with its damaging effects on the environment, makes China’s emphasis on coal investments concerning. Fortunately, the efforts to “green” the Belt and Road can help to drive financial flows towards more sustainable, profitable, clean, and low-carbon energy sources.

Source: NRDC

Support through loans and insurance for specific renewables projects has increased in recent years, with 2018 being the highest year yet in terms of dollars invested. While both commercial and policy investment appear to dip from 2015 to 2016, in 2017 renewable investment regains steam, and by 2018 there is significant growth. This growth is encouraging, but it remains to be seen if investment will persist in the coming years or if it will flag once more. The bulk of Chinese renewables support through project loans is provided by Chinese commercial banks such as Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Industrial Commercial Bank of China. (It should be noted that they are majority-state owned institutions). Increased investment by China’s commercial banks in particular seems to reflect the growing profitability of renewable energy projects, as costs continue to decline for wind and solar projects worldwide.

Source: NRDC

China’s renewable investments abroad are not limited to BRI countries. Chinese financing for specific renewable energy projects has largely been in Australia and the United States. Victoria state in Australia has signed an agreement with China on BRI, but the United States has not. However, both have become key destinations for Chinese financing for solar and wind energy. According to our data, other destinations for Chinese renewables financing did include several BRI countries, such as the United Arab Emirates and Brazil, both of which have BRI cooperation agreements with the Chinese government.

Chinese commercial institutions have focused on investing in renewables largely in markets that provide greater policy certainty for solar and wind development, either through incentives such as renewable portfolio standards, tax cuts, or other policy measures. In contrast, investment in renewables has been lower in countries that do not offer a stable policy environment for renewables deployment. While the technical renewable energy potential in regions such as Southeast Asia is very high, policy incentives for Chinese engagement in the region are still lacking. Some efforts have been made to address policy issues, for example the joint effort between the ASEAN Center for Energy (ACE) and the China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute (CREEI) to recommend a better feed-in tariff in Southeast Asian countries. This is a good first step, and future efforts should follow suit.

(Due to limited data availability, corporate loans for companies are not included. Additionally, there would be difficulty sorting corporate loans that support projects within China from BRI projects.)

Source: NRDC

Example: Cauchari Solar Plant

Even though only a small percentage of China’s financing and direct investment in the energy sector through BRI is going towards renewables, there are already glimpses of the massive potential to scale up renewable energy investment by China through the Belt and Road Initiative, if the right policies are in place. The Cauchari Solar Plantcurrently under construction in Argentina is expected to produce 300 MW of power, expanding to 500 MW over time. The $390 million project is primarily being funded by the Export-Import Bank of China and Shanghai Power Construction is leading the construction using Chinese company Talesun’s solar panels.

Upon completion, Cauchari will reduce carbon emissions by around 325,000 tonnes. The project is an important step in helping Argentina reach its goal of expanding renewables to account for 20 percent of the nation’s energy by 2025, and represents the close ties between China and Argentina within the Belt and Road Initiative. Argentina’s dedicated renewable energy program, RenovAr, along with its feed-in tariff for solar projects has made it an attractive market for Chinese investment.   

Renewable investments are clearly a viable option for both government funds and Chinese companies and can go a long way in helping nations meet their domestic clean energy targets and intentions under the Paris Agreement.  


In addition to the financing for renewables projects overseas, China is a major supplier of solar panels globally. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance China exported 15 GW of solar panels to Japan from 2012-2017. Other top importers of Chinese solar equipment are the U.S., the Netherlands, and India. While Chinese exports focus largely on solar equipment, wind equipment exports to countries like Pakistan, South Africa, and the U.S. are also notable.

Source: BNEF

terms of photovoltaics, Jinko Solar, Canadian Solar, GCL, LONGi, Trina Solar, JA Solar, Chint and more have established solar cell and module production bases in countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and Germany, forming a supply chain and market network of high-end solar equipment connecting China with foreign countries.


In the field of EPC, Chinese companies including PowerChina and Gezhouba Group worked on EPC for renewable energy in countries such as Laos, Nigeria, Ghana, and Guinea. In terms of concentrated solar power, SEPCOIII also cooperated on a CSP project in Morocco.


Acquisition is another vehicle for Chinese involvement in energy projects abroad. From 2007 to 2017 Chinese companies have acquired 23 GW of power projects abroad. The bulk of these projects are coal, but there are some solar, wind, and hydro projects in the mix as well.

Source: BNEF

In terms of wind, PowerChina participated in the Dawood Wind Farm project in Pakistan as the developer and on EPC, and Chinese wind power companies including the China Three Gorges Corporation, the China General Nuclear Power Group, the China Energy Investment Company, Goldwind, Envision Energy, Ming Yang Smart Energy, etc. have participated in the investment and construction of wind projects in the UK, Germany, Australia, and others.


There is huge potential for China’s BRI renewable energy cooperation. China has formed an international development cooperation model for renewable energy, which consists mainly of overseas EPCs, opening production facilities overseas, overseas mergers and acquisitions, and overseas research and development. This cooperation has been focused on the China- Pakistan Economic Corridor, the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Economic Corridor, the China-Indochina Peninsula Economic Corridor, the China-Central Asia-West Asia Economic Corridor, the New Eurasian Land Bridge, the China-Russia-Mongolia Economic Corridor, and China-Africa Cooperation.

It is clear that renewable energy investments are profitable, economically viable, and of the utmost importance for reaching our climate goals. It is in China’s own interest to focus on green development in BRI countries. It is true that many developing countries need to develop their energy infrastructure. These energy systems then should be forward looking, emphasizing renewable projects that will remain profitable rather than coal which may result in stranded assets and ecological damage. China is already undertaking some of the kinds of clean energy projects BRI countries need. Now it is a question of scaling up to meet the greatest environmental challenge of our time – climate change.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and