Skip to main content

Italy takes a chance on Belt and Road


MARCH 18, 2019

Attending the first Belt and Road Forum in Beijing in 2017, the previous Italian prime minister Paolo Gentiloni stopped short of signing up to join the global mega-project, as no other European Union country had shown interest. However, a lot has changed since Italy’s populist right-wing government took over last June, and Rome has formally announced that it will participate in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) after three high-level visits to Beijing

As a country that connects Europe and Africa, Italy is on its way to becoming a prime BRI destination, which will decisively put the contemporary version of the old Silk Road on the ground. In 2018, the EU announced an exclusive mega-project of its own, the “EU Corridor,” as a suitable alternative. Setting aside this option, Rome is determined to participate in the Chinese mega-project instead. Engaged in preliminary negotiations, Rome is about to clinch a deal with Beijing and sign some memoranda of understanding during President Xi Jinping’s visit to Italy at the end of March.

Confirming reports in the media, Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte has said he will also attend the second BRI Summit next month. However, he stressed that EU trade standards would have to be applied and agreed upon by China as this was one of the main reasons the European Union had opted out. Highlighting the importance of Italy’s decision, Conte has described it as a “strategic choice for the country … and such choices need coordinating with traditional partners. Dialogue with the United States, for example, is constant.”

At this point in time, the US does not welcome the prospect, as it is waging a trade war with China. The latest controversy is regarding Chinese technology company Huawei and its role in bringing about a 5G (fifth-generation) telecommunications revolution in other countries. As expected, Washington warned Rome that joining the BRI could significantly damage its global reputation without helping its economy. Implying that the project is beneficial only for Beijing, US National Security Council spokesman Garrett Marquis said, “We view BRI as a ‘made by China, for China’ initiative.” But the main fear may be that Italian ports are at risk because of the confidential terms that usually define Chinese investment.

The Port of Trieste in northeastern Italy is being described as the Chinese gateway to Europe in the New Silk Road, as it is one of the biggest maritime hubs in the Mediterranean. Trieste moved 62.7 million tons of goods last year and it promises to become a central connection for Eurasia as a deal is coming through between the China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), the main builder involved in BRI projects, and the Trieste Port Authority. Another important destination for Beijing is the Sicilian city of Palermo, as it is close to the African continent. In the meantime, a new company is being created in partnership with the Chinese state-run shipping company COSCO to run the Port of Genoa.

Ports are a main priority for the BRI as it comprises roads and maritime links. The EU is concerned about whether the contract terms of any of the Italian ports will be mentioned in the MOUs being signed by Rome and Beijing in the coming weeks. In the past, details of such contracts with other BRI countries have been unclear. Having welcomed Chinese investment, Greece’s largest seaport of Piraeus is now operated by COSCO. Resisting China’s economic influence as a result, many of the EU states are mulling over screening measures to streamline and limit Chinese investment in the region.

Italy could face a fierce backlash from the West due to suspicions about China’s geopolitical ambitions. Significantly, Italy will be the first G7 member to help China establish a permanent presence in Western Europe

Most of all, Italy could face a fierce backlash from the West due to suspicions about China’s geopolitical ambitions. Significantly, Italy will be the first Group of Seven member to help China establish a permanent presence in Western Europe. Undoubtedly, this is a major win for China, which has always emphasized that the BRI is a global project but failed to get a welcoming response outside Asia. Being the world’s eighth-largest economy and a European country, Italy’s partnership in the BRI will finally elevate it to the rank of a truly global project and take it to the next level. Where Beijing is concerned, this is a perfect win-win situation as the BRI is an official part of China’s constitution and foreign policy.

Last week, it was also reported that Italy was looking into seeking funding from the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. According to an EU diplomat, “The potential involvement of the AIIB in the BRI in Italy is a game changer. Without the AIIB’s involvement in lending to projects, it would be difficult for the BRI to fly in a key EU member state.”

Italy had to concentrate on reviving its faltering economy as it fell into recession last year for the third time in a decade. In return for becoming a “BRI country,” Rome wants a good chunk of investment and a boost in exports to improve its financial standing. Other EU countries have excellent trade links with China, with German exports to that country alone worth €93.8 billion (US$106 billion) last year. In comparison, Italy’s exports to China totaled just €13.17 billion in 2018 and it is feeling left out.

Stressing that Italy remains part of the EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, an Italian Economic Development Ministry official, Michele Geraci, recently observed, “We are in no way tilting the geopolitical axis.” However, the fact remains that Italy has opted to abstain from the EU vote taken this month to scrutinize foreign investment in Europe, since it has decided to take a chance on the world’s biggest mega-project.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed. Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area” For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number” Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell yo

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میں Please help the deserving persons... Salary: Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows; Welder: Rs. 1,700 daily Heavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Mason: Rs. 1,500 daily Helper: Rs. 850 daily Electrician: Rs. 1,700 daily Surveyor: Rs. 2,500 daily Security Guard: Rs. 1,600 daily Bulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Concrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Roller operator: Rs. 2,000 daily Steel fixer: Rs. 2,200 daily Iron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 daily Account clerk: Rs. 2,200 daily Carpenter: Rs. 1,700 daily Light duty driver: Rs. 1,700 daily Labour: Rs. 900 daily Para Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 daily Pipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 daily Storekeeper: Rs. 1,700 daily Office boy: Rs. 1,200 daily Excavator operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Shovel operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Computer operator: Rs. 2,200 daily Security Supervisor: Rs.

A ‘European Silk Road’

publication_icon Philipp Heimberger ,  Mario Holzner and Artem Kochnev wiiw Research Report No. 430, August 2018  43 pages including 10 Tables and 17 Figures FREE DOWNLOAD The German version can be found  here . In this study we argue for a ‘Big Push’ in infrastructure investments in greater Europe. We propose the building of a European Silk Road, which connects the industrial centres in the west with the populous, but less developed regions in the east of the continent and thereby is meant to generate more growth and employment in the short term as well as in the medium and long term. After its completion, the European Silk Road would extend overland around 11,000 kilometres on a northern route from Lisbon to Uralsk on the Russian-Kazakh border and on a southern route from Milan to Volgograd and Baku. Central parts are the route from Lyon to Moscow in the north and from Milan to Constanţa in the south. The southern route would link Central Europe with the Black Sea area and