Skip to main content

Legal bump in the belt and road?

A Mideast port giant, a Chinese rival and a Hong Kong lawsuit over a Djibouti deal

in Port News 19/02/2019

A lawsuit against China’s main state-owned port builder by the Middle East’s largest port operator in the tiny African nation of Djibouti – to be thrashed out in Hong Kong’s High Court – underscores the legal risks Beijing faces in its massive global infrastructure plan, the “Belt and Road Initiative”.

Usually, the obstacles to this effort to create the world’s largest platform for economic cooperation – Chinese President Xi Jinping’s plan for expanding the country’s influence abroad through a network of railways, roads, pipelines, and utility grids – have been related to financial or geopolitical issues.

Only last year under the new leadership of Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, the Malaysian government halted two Chinese projects valued at US$22 billion.

The now-defunct projects have joined a list of scrapped or shelved belt and road schemes that includes dams in Nepal and Myanmar, and a power plant in Pakistan.

But the newest hitch in the effort to link China to Asia and beyond highlights a challenge to its perceived right to develop a port business in the African nation of Djibouti. In a first for the belt and road, Hong Kong’s High Court will be the venue for the brewing legal battle.

DP World, a global port operator owned by the United Arab Emirates, is suing Hong Kong-based China Merchants Port Holdings (CM Port), a unit of state-owned China Merchants Group, for allegedly infringing DP World’s exclusive port agreement with Djibouti, which sits on the Horn of Africa near some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

According to court papers filed in August, CM Port allegedly caused the Djibouti government to revoke DP World’s exclusive right to run the country’s ports.

If the case were to go to trial, it would be the first involving a Chinese belt and road project to be ruled on in the city’s courts, FactWire News Agency reported. Hong Kong’s legal jurisdiction is separated from mainland China’s under the city’s mini constitution.

“The nature of the dispute and the fact that the defendant CM Port is a leading state-owned conglomerate based in Hong Kong expanding their port business around the world, has made this case particularly interesting,” said Gu Weixia, a University of Hong Kong associate law professor.

“The case could significantly affect the investment behaviour [especially in a legal sense] of Chinese companies investing in the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ in the future.”

Since Xi first proposed the multibillion-dollar initiative in 2013, Chinese firms eager to receive government support for their overseas deals have rushed to put their investments under the belt and road banner. To date, more than 70 countries – mostly in the Eurasian region – have agreed to take part in the initiative.

China, however, has a special interest in Djibouti, a tiny country on the Horn of Africa between the Arabian and Mediterranean seas.
With the Suez Canal to the north and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait to the south, at least 40 per cent of the world’s maritime oil trade passes along the route, which connects the Middle East and the Persian Gulf to Europe.

Safety over oil trade routes is especially important to China, which is the world’s biggest oil importer.

In another sign of Djibouti’s importance, China’s first and only naval port base officially opened in the country in July 2017, joining the armed forces of the United States, France, Spain and Japan and other nations with overseas military facilities there.

However, the fate of Beijing’s grand strategy in the country could be shaped by state-backed firms and specific projects like the one developed by CM Port, which has been building and operating terminals in Djibouti since 2013.

In the court documents, DP World accused CM Port of inducing the Djibouti government to breach a 30-year concession agreement that gave the Dubai company the exclusive right to develop port businesses along with a free-trade zone.

“We contend that the development and operation of the port and free zone facilities by China Merchants constitutes unfair competition and breaches the exclusivity agreement granted us and our joint venture company by the government of Djibouti,” it said.

DP Port said CM Port had delayed the proceedings in Hong Kong by more than a year by arguing the claim should be brought to the Djibouti courts, where CM Port would seek to get the government to indemnify it against any claims brought by DP World.

DP World and Djibouti have been embroiled in legal battles for nearly a decade over the port deal they signed in 2000.

The company won its case against the Djibouti government over the port terminal’s takeover in September. But the government officially has ignored a ruling by the London Court of International Arbitration that DP World’s port container terminal contract in Djibouti was valid and binding.

After failing to get the Djibouti government to honour either the port deal or the arbitration court’s judgment, the Dubai-based company sought to sue CM Port for damages in the Hong Kong court.

CM Port did not respond to questions about the lawsuit submitted via email by the South China Morning Post. Despite the impending legal challenge, however, it has not shied away from promoting its disputed plan in the African country.

Beijing’s propaganda continues to portray CM Port’s Djibouti projects as examples of successful belt and road activities that have helped a poverty-stricken country build the “most modernised and biggest port in East Africa”.

The message was in keeping with China’s efforts to build a positive image in Africa. The Chinese state enterprise invited five African leaders to the opening of the free-trade zone in Djibouti last year.

Legal experts who specialise in international law, corporate law and arbitration say they believe DP World’s Hong Kong lawsuit ultimately would have little effect on CM Port’s business in Djibouti, even if the Chinese company were to lose the case.

Gu, from the University of Hong Kong, said judgments handed down by the Hong Kong court could not be readily enforced in Djibouti as no treaties or agreements on the recognition or enforcement of legal decisions existed between the two nations.

If the Hong Kong court handed down a judgment, “it would need to be used as evidence to commence fresh proceedings in Dijibouti”, she said.

DP World had not sought an injunction to stop the Chinese company from operating in Djibouti, but even if it did, “an injunction is a remedy that is entirely to the discretionary power of the Hong Kong court and that is not easily granted”, she said.

Wang Jiangyu, an associate law professor at the National University of Singapore with research interests in international and comparative corporate law, said he believed a loss in the lawsuit had the potential to hurt CM Port financially.

“China Merchants has assets in Hong Kong which can be easily enforced to satisfy the claims of the plaintiff if the plaintiffs win the case,” he said.

Shanghai-based lawyer Fang Jianwei said the case highlighted the complexity of the legal challenges facing Chinese companies that invest abroad.

“Companies expanding in the global market, especially those involved in [belt and road] projects, will inevitably face legal challenges,” he said.

“These disputes can go on for years …[they] are also complex and global, as there might be multiple legal proceedings going on in different continents. To manage the legal challenges and risks, the companies must have a global perspective.”
Source: South China Morning Post




https://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/legal-bump-in-the-belt-and-road-a-mideast-port-giant-a-chinese-rival-and-a-hong-kong-lawsuit-over-a-djibouti-deal/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…