Skip to main content

Net Negative: Chinese Investment in the US in 2018

Thilo HanemannCassie Gao, and Adam LysenkoJanuary 13, 2019

More restrictive Chinese policies, stepped-up US investment screening and deterioration of US-China relations had curbed Chinese investors’ appetite for US assets in 2017. In 2018 this slowdown deepened as new investment dropped to a seven-year low. This note reviews the 2018 trends and analyzes the outlook for 2019. The key findings are:

Chinese FDI in the US declined to $4.8 billion in 2018: Last year Chinese companies completed acquisitions and greenfield investments in the United States worth only $4.8 billion, down 84% from $29 billion in 2017 and 90% from $46 billion in 2016. This represents the lowest level seen in seven years.

Net Chinese FDI in the US was negative if one accounts for asset divestitures: Chinese investors sold $13 billion of US assets in 2018, mostly driven by deleveraging pressures from Beijing. Counting these divestitures, China’s net US direct investment was negative to the tune of $8 billion last year.

Chinese venture capital investment hit a new record in 2018: In contrast to the slowdown in FDI, Chinese venture capital financing in the US hit a new record of $3.1 billion in 2018 as investors were less impacted by regulatory hurdles. However, a slowdown in China’s technology sector and an expansion of US screening to include certain VC transactions present headwinds for Chinese outbound venture investment, some of which were already visible in the second half of the year.

Pressures will persist in 2019: The pipeline of pending Chinese investments in the US is at a five-year low, and most hurdles weighing on China’s US investment are poised to persist or deepen: Beijing looks to continue outbound capital controls and its financial deleveraging campaign; Washington is moving to implement tougher screening of venture capital and other high-tech acquisitions; and the dark cloud over US-China relations is unlikely to disappear, although a major deal between China and the US could help revitalize investor appetite in sectors with low national security sensitivities.

Chinese FDI in the US Drops Steeply

After dropping from a record high of $46 billion in 2016 to $29 billion in 2017, completed Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the US took another plunge in 2018, dropping to just $4.8 billion. This represents the lowest level since 2011 (Figure 1). The number of transactions also declined (albeit less sharply), from 162 in 2016 and 166 in 2017 to 120 in 2018.

Policy was mainly responsible for this continued decline. As we predicted, China has not meaningfully loosened outbound capital controls as its Balance of Payments situation remains fragile. Over the past year, Beijing’s deleveraging campaign has emerged as another important variable, curbing liquidity in the market and forcing private firms to prioritizing domestic debt consolidation instead of global expansion. In the United States, the Trump administration has actively utilized the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to scrutinize Chinese acquisitions, pushing the number of Chinese transactions abandoned due to unresolved national security concerns to an all-time high. On top of that, trade barriers and a generally more confrontational stance toward China have created tremendous uncertainty for Chinese companies in the US, dampening investor appetite and increasing the risk perception of US sellers.

Asset Divestitures of $13 Billion Turn Net FDI Negative

In addition to investing less, Chinese firm also divested assets at an unprecedented pace in 2018. This trend was driven by some of the most prominent investors that drove the 2015-2016 outbound investment boom as they have been forced to unwind their global holdings to clean up their books and reduce debt levels. We count a total of $13 billion in completed divestitures in 2018, and another $20 billion are still pending (Figure 2). Counting divestitures, Chinese net FDI inflows to the US were negative to the tune of $8 billion last year.

Chinese Venture Capital Thrived

In stark contrast to the FDI depression, Chinese venture capital (VC) investment in the United States continued to thrive in 2018. Annual investment (estimated as the pro-rata Chinese share of each funding round’s value based on the number of participating investors) climbed from $2.1 billion in 2017 to $3.1 billion in 2018 – a new record (Figure 3).

The number of funding rounds did not change much year-over-year, but participation shifted to later-stage transactions at larger valuations. The biggest recipients were battery maker Farasis Energy (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and others) gaming company Epic Games (Lightspeed China Partners) and biotechnology firms Grail and Viela Bio (6 Dimensions Capital, Hillhouse Capital and others).

Outlook: Uncertainty Continues

At the beginning of 2019, the pipeline of pending Chinese transactions remains thinner than in previous years (only $5 billion, compared to over $10 billion at the end of 2017). The biggest pending deal remains Oceanwide’s $2.7 billion takeover of Genworth Financial, which has received CFIUS clearance and is expected to close in the first half of 2019. One bright spot is greenfield FDI, where we registered a noticeable increase in newly announced projects in the second half of 2018 in response to trade barriers, especially in basic materials, automotive and some consumer sectors.

However, we expect most policy variables that dragged down Chinese investment in 2018 to remain in place in 2019. Beijing is unlikely to abandon its interventionist stance on outbound investment as climbing interest rates in the US will further incentivize capital outflows and add pressure on China’s balance of payments. While we see some partial relaxation of financial conditions, we don’t expect Beijing to leave the path of deleveraging and allow a return to conditions that helped fuel the previous outbound investment boom. This means Chinese firms will likely follow through with divestment of more than $20 billion of US assets that they have reportedly been seeking to sell.

The implementation of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act (FIRRMA) will further complicate the picture. FIRRMA reinforces a stricter application of national security screenings of Chinese FDI as well as non-FDI transactions (such as venture capital) in critical emerging technologies and critical infrastructure. Data from the last quarter of 2018 already show signs of preliminary impacts, for example a downturn in VC investments by Chinese corporate venture investors (whereas passive financially-motivated investments by professional VC firms are holding up better).

Finally, the uncertain outlook for broader US-China economic relations will continue to weigh on investor sentiment. After several rounds of punitive tariffs and retaliations between the US and China, the two sides agreed on a 90-day pause in the trade war, and negotiations are still ongoing. The outcome of these talks will be an important variable for the 2019 outlook. If a sustainable solution is reached, we could see an increase in deal making in sectors that are not traditionally considered sensitive from a national security perspective such as consumer goods or healthcare.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

Historical relationship between Kurd and Baloch.

The Kurds are the ethnical group living in a region known as Kurdistan which is divided into Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran. They  are struggling for an independent region since decades and they are famous for their female guerrilla fighters.        On 25 September 2017, the referendum for an independent Kurdish region  was held in Iraq with a turn out of 72 %.   On this important occasion, the historical relation between Kurd and Baloch people is worth discussing.       When it comes to history, every nation tends to find its roots and origin. Same goes with the Baloch people. The Baloch people are always curious  about  finding their roots in history. Even if you  talk to a shepherd in Balochistan, he will be curious to talk about his  tribal or ethnical roots.      The Balochs have always conveyed the history to the next generations in different mediums like poems etc. No Baloch before 20th century had written books on  history  or origin of the Baloch nation .