Skip to main content

CPEC liabilities and repayments

By Hasaan Khawar

Published: January 1, 2019

The writer is a public policy expert and an honorary Fellow of Consortium for Development Policy Research. He tweets @hasaankhawar

Recently, a news item appearing in The Express Tribune highlighted that the CPEC investments of $26.5 billion would eventually lead to $40 billion of outflows over 20 years. The government was quick to issue a rebuttal and claimed that government liabilities related to CPEC are only limited to $6 billion.

This is not the first time this controversy has been raised and there have been various conflicting reports on CPEC-related liabilities. It is, therefore, important to objectively look at this issue and unpack this discussion.

There are three intertwined issues that must be looked at separately. Firstly, the CPEC investments include both government-to-government borrowing and commercial loans and investments. The government’s direct liability of $6 billion may be a small part of the overall CPEC portfolio, but most of the commercial investments under CPEC are also guaranteed by the government and would, therefore, add to its contingent liabilities. The government must, therefore, also disclose its CPEC-related contingent liabilities, whenever it mentions its direct liabilities.

Moreover, the balance of payments does not only depend on government borrowing, and any profit repatriation is also reflected as current account outflows. The CPEC-related outflows of $2-3 billion per annum for the next few years, on account of total investment of $26 billion, would, therefore, have a direct bearing on Pakistan’s balance of payments, irrespective of the fact that CPEC energy projects were undertaken in the IPP mode.

The second issue pertains to Pakistan’s ability to repay CPEC loans and manage other outflows. Pakistan’s total external debt is close to $100 billion. Not only does the CPEC-related government debt constitute a mere 6% of this external debt stock but it is almost as high as the recent deposits committed by the UAE and Saudi Arabia in the last two months. Moreover, Pakistan’s multilateral debt is at least 4-5 times the CPEC debt. It is, therefore, absurd to claim that CPEC loans have added significantly to Pakistan’s debt burden.

Furthermore, the balance of payments is a much larger issue for Pakistan, with CPEC playing a minuscule role in it. Considering Pakistan’s annual imports of more than $60 billion, the expected annual CPEC-related outflows only account for 15-20 days of the import bill. Isn’t it prudent to slightly rationalise our imports to pay for the assets that we have built under CPEC?

The third issue is the terms and conditions of CPEC financing. While the interest ranged from 2% on concessional loans to as high as LIBOR + 4.5% for commercial loans, it were the equity investments that were perhaps the most expensive. Assuming a 75:25 debt-to-equity ratio, the equity part out of $16 billion CPEC energy portfolio should stand around $4 billion. Against this investment, the dividend payments are expected to be almost three times or $11.4 billion. This is because of the excessively-high return on equity (ROE) ensured on these projects. On coal power projects, for instance, the ROE was as high as 27-34% for 30 years, even for imported coal. What exactly are the reasons for allowing these disproportionately-high returns for an environmentally-hazardous technology, and that too in a time period when the costs of renewable energy are sliding down, remain unclear.

However, we must realise that CPEC has provided the much-needed infrastructure financing for Pakistan, leading to improved power-generation capacity and better connectivity, and now it’s for us to make best use of this improved infrastructure.

The real focus of CPEC, therefore, should not be on mulling over repayments of contracts that have already been agreed upon by both countries and rather on how we can increase our exports, encourage Chinese industry to relocate to Pakistan and form better business linkages with China. If we do it right, we can more than compensate for these outflows.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 1st, 2019.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…