Skip to main content

Why did Daniel Andrews go it alone with his China deal?

By Amanda Vanstone

12 November 2018 — 2:21pm

The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative is breathtaking in its vision. Chinese co-funded projects extending from Kazakhstan to Africa, through south-east Asia and into the Pacific.

China's Belt and Road Initiative plans to connect south-east Asian countries with the south-west region of Yunnan province through a series of high-speed railways. CREDIT:BLOOMBERG

Two wise people sitting at the same table might disagree as to whether it's all about friendship and co-operation or about spreading China’s already significant influence. I think it’s both. The simple fact is it is the biggest initiative in China’s foreign policy.

So in your wildest dreams can you imagine NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian heading off and doing a Belt and Road deal without telling Scott Morrison or Marise Payne? Of course not, because she understands that the Commonwealth has responsibility for foreign affairs and national security. She understands the federation we live in.

No doubt she also understands why our Parliament recently significantly strengthened our national security legislation. It’s a changing world and we need to keep up to date in all fields, not least foreign espionage incursions. For that reason alone it would have occurred to Berejiklian to just check things out with her federal counterparts. Belt and Road brings opportunities for collaboration that in some areas invites questions of national security.




Daniel Andrews releases details of Belt and Road agreement with China

Add to shortlist

NSW is lucky to have Gladys.

Poor old Victoria got landed with a Premier in Daniel Andrews who thinks, apparently, that he can go it alone internationally.

To understand the mindset in the Premier's office, doing a deal with China would have been big news and high up on their agenda. The office would be buzzing.

So why the secrecy? If it was such a great idea, surely Victorian voters would have been elated. Holding it back understandably raised deep suspicion. Labor finally released the memorandum of undersanding on Sunday evening, following heavy criticism from the Coalition for signing the deal and keeping its contents secret.


Building relationships with China is important. After all, Chinese interest in Australia goes back at least to the gold rush days. Thousands of Chinese came here seeking their fortune. Many attribute the Australian colloquialism “fair dinkum” to their prevalence on the gold fields (apparently “fair dinkum” is a phonetic derivation from a Chinese dialect for “pure gold”. I think it’s a good story, even though some disagree.)



Andrews government fails to see strategic risks in Chinese investment

Add to shortlist

Chinese migration to Australia goes back to those early gold rush days as well. These days one hesitates to stereotype but I think the Chinese migration story has been great for Australia.  Trade and investment between us and China is growing and I hope that continues.

Nonetheless China is a very savvy operator and as with all our friends and partners, we need to keep our eyes open and our interests guarded.

State governments and even local governments can make whatever deals they like. But given the prominence and controversy surrounding the Belt and Road Initiative, doing so on a "go-it-alone basis" looked both stupid and shifty.


Without consulting the Commonwealth government, which has responsibility for foreign affairs and national security, how could the Victorian government know if there were any matters of which they were unaware which they should take into account?

Play Video

Play Video


China's 'One Belt, One Road' propaganda

There are some very positive aspects to the BRI. Infrastructure spending is desperately needed in many parts of the world, not least the Indo-Pacific. It is fair, however, to expect that all the deals entered into are equitable for all parties.

We don't think much of banks who make loans that are almost impossible to repay. We expect them to be good corporate citizens and not to prey on the vulnerable. We should expect the same of aid deals. We don't know what the deal was but we do know Sri Lanka no longer owns its redeveloped port.

It's also reasonable to ensure that workers on the projects are treated appropriately. Standards globally will not be the same as in Australia but there will be standards. Our governments should ensure that whatever they get involved in or facilitate plays no part in the exploitation of locals. Put plainly, it’s better to keep your hands clean.


Normally most of us wouldn’t get excited about what happens in another state. It’s their business, we might say. But our foreign relations and our national security are all of our concern. We live in a federation where those are Commonwealth responsibilities. Go-it-alone states acting like cowboys aren’t helpful for any of us.

Federal Labor politicians have been critical to the media of the Victorian move without allowing their names to be used.

Something’s going on. Clearly whichever federal Labor people are talking to the media are trying to distance themselves from what Victoria has done. It reads as though it was a surprise to them. I think that’s codswallop.

In each state, while the state and federal members don’t live in each other’s pockets, they do talk to each other. State and federal leaders, especially, talk to one another. Bill Shorten and the Victorian Labor Senators and members move in the same union circles as their state colleagues. Labor governs in Victoria. Seriously, does anyone really believe these people don’t talk to each other?

Put it another way. Does anyone believe that a Labor premier wouldn't tell a Labor federal leader about such an initiative?


Amanda Vanstone is a Fairfax columnist and former Coalition minister.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…