Skip to main content

Treading the trade war tightrope

Stasa Salacanin | Published: 00:00, Nov 01,2018 | Updated: 23:40, Oct 31,2018


Trump’s latest campaign to put pressure on China, with the option of raising existing trade tariffs of 10 per cent to 25 per cent by year-end, is just part of an escalating trade war between two super economic powers that could have disastrous effects – with the fragile Middle East destined to feel the pinch

ONE of the key hotspots of the trade dispute is likely to be Iran — a country with very close ties to China and one of the main Chinese suppliers of crude. After the United States unilaterally walked away from the Iran nuclear deal, China remained the only certain meaningful customer of Iran capable of ignoring US sanctions and retaliation measures. 
Of late Beijing has been Tehran’s most important trading partner, accounting for 25.6 per cent of imports and 19.7 per cent of exports. In addition, China has also made clear that it will not stop buying Iranian oil and break commercial ties with Tehran, especially having cut imports of US crude amid the ongoing trade war with America. On the other hand, however, China has also pledged not to increase its oil purchases from Iran.

Seizing the opportunity
MOHAMMADBAGHER Forough, a research associate at the Clingendael Institute and assistant professor of International Relations at Leiden University said that the US sanctions against Iran are a perfect economic and energy opportunity for China for three reasons.
Firstly, China can use its relations with Iran as leverage against the United States.
Secondly, with European companies leaving Iran for fear of being sanctioned, Chinese companies that are more protected and cannot be sanctioned by the US, are now free to enter the Iranian energy market and stand to benefit greatly from deals originally designed for European companies.
Thirdly, due to the fear of sanctions, many countries will be hesitant to enter into energy deals with Iran. This will give China more bargaining power against Iran when it comes to pricing. 
Nevertheless, it remains to be seen to what extent and how successfully China will continue its co-operation with Iran and whether Beijing can withstand the pressure from Washington. Just recently, China’s top refiner Sinopec halved its oil imports from Iran as of September, seen by some as bowing to pressure from the United States, which is currently seeking to reduce Iranian oil exports down to zero.
Although president Trump has already proven unpredictable and erratic, Andrea Ghiselli, a project manager with ChinaMed consultancy and researcher at the school of international relations and public affairs of Fudan University in Shanghai does not think the US will hit Chinese banks involved in the purchase of Iranian oil. According to him, this would be seen as a direct attack against China and it would be highly destabilising for Sino-US relations.
Moreover, Ghiselli predicts that China may try moving away from trading Iranian oil using US dollars. This would come as no surprise considering the degree of interest in the crude futures contract traded on the Shanghai International Energy Exchange. Although Iranian oil is not deliverable through the Shanghai exchange, it seems likely that there are workarounds.

Domino effect of any Chinese economic slowdown
SINCE crude oil is a key strategic commodity for Beijing, the Gulf states are also top Chinese energy partners which could get caught in the crossfire of a global trade war. Any prolonged dispute between the US and China could cool down Chinese industrial activity and consequently decrease oil demand, with the attendant impact on oil-dependent Gulf economies.
According to Ghiselli’s research paper ‘China and the Middle East: Growing influence and divergent perceptions’, China imports anywhere between 11 and 90 per cent (depending on the country in question) of crude oil and natural gas.
In addition, any inflation of Chinese products would have a serious impact on the Gulf, as Chinese imports to the GCC totalled $47.7 billion in 2017, representing 11.4 per cent of imports in the region, according to EU data.
Some believe that the trade war could affect China’s plans for the Middle East, primarily their Belt and Road initiative which might need to be reconsidered. This would be a significant blow for all parties involved, as Middle Eastern countries would miss out on an excellent opportunity to intensify their diversification efforts.
The fate of the Chinese loan for economic development in the region worth $23 billion, which was announced during the China Arab States Cooperation Forum, is also up in the air, as the current US-China tariff war could force China to reconsider its investment.
This also brings us to the question of whether the current US administration will try to exert pressure on Gulf countries in an attempt to sabotage any future deals between the Middle East and China.

Internal GCC rifts are a stumbling block
IT WOULD come as no surprise, says Ghiselli, to learn that the US is putting pressure on other countries to prevent them from becoming too close with China. Yet the main stumbling block to cementing relations between the Gulf States and Beijing can be found in the deep divisions among the GCC members themselves. It is no mystery that bickering among the GCC countries has brought discussions surrounding the China-GCC free trade agreement to a standstill.
Mohammadbagher Forough believes that the US will try to force players to pick sides, conceding, however, that ‘China is currently unparalleled in terms of what it can offer the region economically.’
Despite mounting pressure, Gulf nations are bound to do their best to balance relations with both the US and China. According to Ghiselli, there is little chance that they will break ranks with the security alliances and partnerships they have with the U.S. merely because of China, yet the logic of economic diversification is likely to see them drifting eastwards in the long run., October 26.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…