Skip to main content

Silk Road Headlines

Clingendale Institute

31 October 2018

Source: Louis Vest/flickr

 Despite assurances by China’s leaders that the Belt and Road Initiative is not driven by geopolitical motives, BRI does have major geopolitical significance. The influence that China gains through BRI is increasingly viewed in relation to great power politics. Ian Bremmer, the president of Eurasia Group, believes that in the next five to ten years the global market will be split into a US-led and a China-led part [US And China Going Their Separate Economic, Political Ways: Experts]. According to him, Japan and Europe will side with the US, while emerging economies that rely on Chinese investment will align with China. In this view, the BRI is a major tool for Beijing to draw non-Western countries into its orbit. So while the economic rise of China has triggered an intensifying geopolitical competition with the US, the Belt and Road Initiative – equally a consequence of China’s economic rise - is increasingly perceived as a wedge between the West and the non-Western world.

Whereas the Chinese government - increasingly unconvincingly - tries to downplay the geopolitical significance of BRI, the initiative’s military dimension is sometimes overemphasised by foreign commentators, especially in regard to China’s role in the Indian Ocean region. An example is the port of Hambantota in Sri Lanka, which is sometimes portrayed as a de facto Chinese military base by non-Chinese sources. The underlying thought is that because a Chinese state-owned company has operational control of the port, the People’s Liberation Army is free to use the port should it wish to do so. An article by Natalie Klein rightly points out that ‘a military base is not the same as a port and while a port may obviously be used for naval vessels, the two should not be conflated’ [A String of Fake Pearls? The Question of Chinese Port Access in the Indian Ocean]. A Chinese company operating a foreign port is in itself not sufficient for the Chinese navy to gain access to that port, just like the absence of a Chinese port operator does not preclude frequent use of a port by the Chinese navy. BRI’s military significance exists, as the establishment of a Chinese naval base in Djibouti has shown, and will surely increase, but the bigger issue seems to be the initiative’s potential to draw the non-Western world closer to China, and away from the US and its allies.

Frans-Paul van der Putten

The next issue of Silk Road Headlines will be dated 8 November 2018

This week's Silk Road Headlines

Chinese Debt Trap Will Trigger Trade Colonialism For Small And Weaker Nations In Belt And Road Initiative: What Does It Presage? – Analysis [Eurasia Review

EU disapproves of broad gauge extension Bratislava-Vienna []

Botched Chinese railway project in Africa is a warning to belt and road investors[South China Morning Post

It Is a new era, but China’s balancing act will fail in the Middle East [Middle East Monitor]

Japan joins to shape China’s Belt and Road [East Asia Forum]

Pakistan--IMF Could Either Kill CPEC Or Help Build It Right [Forbes]

Africa needs Belt and Road. On its own terms [Belt and Road Advisory] Podcast

A String of Fake Pearls? The Question of Chinese Port Access in the Indian Ocean [The Diplomat]

With an Influx of Blue Helmets and Cash, China’s Role in African Security Grows More Pervasive [ChinaFile]

US And China Going Their Separate Economic, Political Ways: Experts [Forbes]

To increase awareness of and facilitate the debate on China's Belt and Road Initiative, the Clingendael Institute publishes Silk Road Headlines, a weekly update on relevant news articles from open sources.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…