Skip to main content

Papua New Guinea rejects US criticisms of Chinese 'Belt and Road'

By David Wroe

20 November 2018 — 5:23pm

Papua New Guinea’s Foreign Minister has rejected the United States assessment that Chinese development money is “a constricting belt” and a “one-way road” for poor nations following a bruising APEC summit at which the two superpowers stared each other down.

Also on Tuesday, PNG police and soldiers reportedly stormed the country’s parliament, smashing windows and furniture as they demanded unpaid APEC bonuses.

Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato has told Fairfax Media that PNG, which has signed on to Beijing’s “Belt and Road Initiative” infrastructure-building program, will continue to do whatever best solves his people’s problems.

PNG's Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato speaks during the APEC ministerial meeting in Port Moresby last week.CREDIT:AP

Infrastructure development is increasingly being seen as a strategic battleground, with the US and Australia concerned about the amount of work China is doing in the Pacific and whether it has a sinister long-term intent.


Mr Pato also expressed caution on whether the redeveloped Manus Island naval base - which the US has announced it will help with alongside Australia - will eventually be used as a major strategic hub to project military power into the Pacific Ocean where China is increasingly flexing its muscle.

In a clear broadside against the Belt and Road Initiative, US Vice-President Mike Pence told an APEC audience at the weekend that his country offered “a better option” that wouldn't imperil small nations’ sovereignty by saddling them with unmanageable debt.

"We don't offer a constricting belt or one-way road," he said.

Australia remains "partner of choice" for PNG: Mr Pato greets former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in April, 2017.CREDIT:ALEX ELLINGHAUSEN

Asked about these remarks, Mr Pato said: “Our own position is that we welcome every partner of PNG who would like to contribute to our national development aspirations. We welcome Chinese investment, we welcome USA investment. Of course Australia and NZ are traditional partners. We would not be seeking to engage in any conflict, as it were.”


While PNG has been praised for its smooth running of the APEC summit, witnesses reportedly said hundreds of police and military troops had protested at non-payment of their A$145 weekend bonus, with some breaking into parliament and damaging property.

A police spokesman said no one was hurt, according to Agence France-Presse.

China has become deeply involved in PNG and Pacific nations more broadly in recent years, building roads, bridges and wharves. Vanuatu on Monday confirmed it had also signed up to “Belt and Road”.

Mr Pato said China as a new donor country would present “challenges” and said that Australia remained a “partner of choice” for PNG, both on security and infrastructure.

“In the first instance, we’ll look to Australia but it will depend on the nature of the partnership that is required,” he said.


“We’re not in any way suggesting that China is bringing in development funding or building projects which undermine our systems. What we’re saying is the experience is a new one.”

Mr Pence also announced at the weekend the US would “partner” with PNG and Australia on developing the Manus Island naval base and appeared to link the Manus redevelopment to China.

But Mr Pato said there were still many details to be worked out about how the redevelopment would proceed - including the exact US involvement.

“Really it’s matter between Papua New Guinea and Australia because of our ongoing security partnership. Should the US want to come in and at what stage and to what extent, we will see the details when they come and talk to them about it,” he said.

“At the end of the day, we have to work on our own strategy as a sovereign nation and consult with our own people, particularly the Manus Island people.”


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…