Skip to main content

Belt and Road investment under fire in Indonesia’s presidential elections

20 November 2018

Author: Gatra Priyandita, ANU

In April 2019, Indonesian President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo will face retired general Prabowo Subianto in a ‘rematch’ presidential election. Foreign policy issues do not determine who wins elections in Indonesia, but they give candidates a chance to prove their nationalist credentials.

Several foreign policy issues have emerged in the presidential campaigns, which began in late September 2018. One notable issue is concerns over Chinese investment in Indonesia. Since his electoral victory in 2014, Jokowi has been courting Chinese state-owned enterprises and private investors to help fulfil ambitious plans to improve the country’s poor connectivity and energy infrastructure.

According to a World Bank report, Indonesia has an infrastructure gap of US$1.5 trillion compared to other emerging economies. While the government aims to invest US$327 billion in infrastructure during Jokowi’s first term (2014–19), it will only spend US$15 billion from the state budget and around US$45.7 billion from state-owned enterprises. The rest will need to come from other sources, including private sector and overseas funding. Notably, the Jokowi administration has repeatedly approached China for funding in relation to Beijing’s pledge to spend trillions on infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

While the Indonesian government does not formally recognise Chinese-funded projects as being under the aegis of the BRI, it recognises some complementarity between the BRI and Jokowi’s own infrastructure vision. In particular, the Indonesian government is seeking Chinese investment to develop economic corridors in North Sumatra, North Kalimantan, North Sulawesi and Bali.

As recently as 22 October 2018, Indonesia’s envoy for the BRI and Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs Luhut Panjaitan visited Beijing to discuss how the BRI can help facilitate Jokowi’s infrastructure vision. That same day, Prabowo’s brother and his campaign’s communications director Hashim Djojohadikusumo announced in a press conference that Prabowo will review existing BRI projects in Indonesia if he wins the election.

The announcement by the Prabowo camp isn’t entirely surprising. Jokowi’s rivals, including Prabowo, have long been critical of Jokowi’s courting of Chinese investment for the administration’s ambitious infrastructure splurge. Delayed progress on construction, rumours of ‘swarming’ Chinese labourers and fears of a potential ‘debt trap’ have emerged as some of the primary concerns over Chinese-funded projects.

One controversial project is the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway — a US$6 billion project, of which 75 per cent will be funded by loans from the China Development Bank. Hashim has said that the project ‘doesn’t serve a purpose’. Critics question both the profitability and utility of the project, considering that the railway is only 150 kilometres long and that there are cheaper transport alternatives. The project’s construction has also been delayed due to problems with land acquisition, environmental concerns and inconsistencies in spatial plans.

Another important issue, which is also haunting the Jakarta–Bandung railway, is the exaggerated numbers of illegal Chinese labourers that are claimed to be partaking in the construction of Chinese-funded projects. Fabricated information circulated online in late 2016 claiming that up to 10 million illegal Chinese workers had entered Indonesia was enough to start a public debate about the status of Chinese labourers in Indonesia. Debates intensified between March and May 2018 following the Jokowi administration’s decision to expedite the process to approve work permits for foreign workers.

Public concern over Chinese-funded projects has not fallen on deaf ears. Luhut, who heads a task force for the implementation of Jokowi’s Global Maritime Fulcrum, has laid down a number of conditions for accepting BRI projects. These include requirements on the use of environmentally friendly technology and local workers, and the construction of upstream and downstream facilities. China, for its part, has listened. During Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s visit to Jakarta in May 2018, he called on Chinese companies to hire primarily Indonesian workers.

While Jokowi’s infrastructure drive has borne some fruit, the problems haunting Chinese investment projects are likely to remain salient topics in the presidential elections. Jokowi’s rivals will no doubt keep a close eye on these projects for potentially inflammatory issues on which to gain public support. Several reasons help to explain why.

Despite significant developments in diplomatic ties in the post-Suharto era, China–Indonesia relations are still marked by the two countries’ acrimonious history and questions about the loyalty of Chinese Indonesians. Indonesia’s relations with China are consequently vulnerable to politicisation. Jokowi also banks his performance on the success of his infrastructure programs and it is likely that his rivals will try to find fault in his claims of success. This criticism would conform with the tendency of Jokowi’s rivals to slander him for being too close to the Chinese business community. Similar accusations haunted Jokowi’s once closest ally and former Jakarta governor Basuki ‘Ahok’ Tjahaja Purnama during the 2017 gubernatorial elections.

At a rally in early November 2018, Jokowi encouraged his supporters to fight against social media hoaxes, including the exaggerated numbers of illegal Chinese workers in Indonesia. Identity politics and economics will be the hot-button issues in 2019. Unfortunately for Chinese investors, BRI projects are vulnerable to politicisation from both these angles.

Gatra Priyandita is a PhD candidate at the Coral Bell School of Asia-Pacific Affairs, The Australian National University.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…