Skip to main content

A New Direction for China’s Belt and Road

The massive infrastructure development program needs a course correction.


Editorial Board

November 2, 2018, 4:00 AM GMT+5:30

Even Pakistan has begun to question some Chinese loans.

 Photographer: Asim Hafeez/Bloomberg

“To get rich, first build a road” is one of those Chinese proverbs that tends to impress foreigners — evoking, as it does, a combination of farsightedness and concern for practicalities. As China is discovering with its globe-spanning Belt and Road project, though, the world doesn’t always play along. The initiative has run into trouble, and its success now depends on revisiting both the vision and the details.

QuicktakeChina’s New Silk Road

Five years ago Chinese President Xi Jinping began promoting a network of Chinese-financed roads, pipelines, ports, power plants and other infrastructure across Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe. Back then, the idea sold itself. China had unmatched skill at building megaprojects, and limitless pools of capital with which to fund them. Host countries, often spurned by the West and its big development banks, desperately needed better roads and other infrastructure to facilitate trade and commerce. 

In the Works

Major projects include ports, pipelines and railroads

Source: Mercator Institute for China Studies

The shine has since come off. Malaysians, for the first time, recently threw out their ruling party because of anger about Chinese encroachment. Strongmen leaders in Sri Lanka and the Maldives have fallen for similar reasons. Malaysia has suspended or canceled Chinese projects worth more than $22 billion, and Myanmar has severely scaled back a $10 billion port scheme. Thailand and even Pakistan (one of China’s closest allies) have criticized Chinese lending terms.

The sheer size of the Belt and Road program, often called a trillion-dollar enterprise, has bred paranoia and resentment. Host countries fear being sucked into so-called debt traps — especially after China in effect seized a strategically located Sri Lankan port when the island’s government couldn’t service its loan. Opaque deal-making has bred corruption, sometimes on a large scale, and alienated voters. In some countries, an influx of Chinese laborers, businessmen and tourists has aroused complaints of cultural invasion.

At home, the initiative has increasingly assumed a political rather than economic rationale. Knowing that Xi has staked his reputation on the scheme, underlings have approved projects in haste and without coordination. Some may never get built; others have been plagued by construction setbacks and spiraling costs. Many are unlikely ever to make money.

China ought to take stock and adjust its plans. From now on, it should focus on the quality of the projects it’s supporting rather than their scale. This shift will need to come from the top, starting with a push for state-owned banks to partner with international lenders and adhere to their standards. Opening tenders to non-Chinese companies and employing more local workers would cut costs and build goodwill. Providing greater transparency, consulting civil-society groups, and carrying out proper social and environmental assessments of projects would probably slow down approvals — but the delay would be justified if it headed off future problems.

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank — which China dominates — has evolved into a well-respected, high-standard lender. There’s no reason China can’t meet global standards in the planning and management of projects. If it did, fewer questionable projects would go forward, and exaggerated fears that the Belt and Road is nothing but a plan to establish China’s hegemony over Eurasia might subside.

The U.S. and its allies have a role to play. Some of China’s projects do pose a clear strategic threat, and intervention in those cases is justified — as when India persuaded Bangladesh not to use Chinese companies to build a deep-water port.

In addition, developed countries could help smaller nations to assess Chinese offers of investment and negotiate better terms. That might mean providing technical assistance to develop higher-quality projects, or creating a multilateral forum to evaluate Chinese bids for their debt sustainability. It could also mean working to strengthen civil society, and to promote democracy, independent courts and a free press, so that citizens can better judge deals for themselves, and hold their leaders to account.

Above all, if the U.S. and others want to contain Chinese influence, they need to provide developing countries with an appealing alternative. The decision to combine various U.S. agencies into a new International Development Finance Corporation will help. Washington ought to collaborate more closely on development initiatives with Japan and other partners. And the U.S. could help itself and developing countries at the same time by doing more to spread the benefits of digitaltechnologies.

China’s Belt and Road needn’t pose a threat and shouldn’t be opposed on principle. Quite the opposite: If China’s investment and expertise succeed in boosting development in poor or unstable regions, the U.S. and other developed nations could benefit too. That’s why Washington’s best course would be to work on strengthening the rules for global trade — so that the goods and services flowing through this new infrastructure are guided by market forces, not political directives. At the moment, of course, the Trump administration is pressing the other way.

To be sure, China’s government isn’t the only one that needs to stop and think. That doesn’t make it any less necessary for Beijing to put the Belt and Road on a smarter and more modest course.

Related analysis: End of the Road?

To contact the senior editor responsible for Bloomberg View’s editorials: David Shipley .



China Is Changing, Far Beyond Tariffs and Exchange Rates


China Is Changing, Far Beyond Tariffs and Exchange Rates

Don’t confuse news with history: The slow turn in China began before Trump’s election and will outlast him.


Daniel Moss

November 2, 2018, 2:30 AM GMT+5:30

China is now consuming as well as producing. That will only accelerate.


Photographer: Wang Zhao/AFP, via Getty Images

Daniel Moss writes and edits articles on economics for Bloomberg Opinion. Previously he was executive editor of Bloomberg News for global economics, and has led teams in Asia, Europe and North America.

This is not your grandfather’s China. It’s not your father’s China. At this rate, quite soon it won’t even be your China.

Recognizing the passing of an era is key to understanding what the world economy will look like beyond the next couple of quarters. That big picture is what is lost in the current handicapping of specific yuan levels and the next tariffs.

The larger point is that China is evolving into a different animal from the one that’s buoyed world commerce the past couple of decades. The current moment is likely to force new changes to the Middle Kingdom’s role in the global economy and accelerate trends already in progress.

It’s not a stretch to figure China’s economic growth may slip to 6 percent this year and less in coming years. The pace has been slowing for the past decade. The halcyon days of double-digit expansion are gone.

It was the bountiful promise of an inexorable boom and a billion-plus people that drove the “China rising” narrative. A favorable, or at least benign, international operating environment underpinned that assumption.

A fellow traveler assumption that, by extension, deserves some scrutiny is the ubiquitous “Asia is the future of the world” line. When many people say that, they’re thinking of China’s performance to date.

And indeed, China is hardly on the verge of a recession. But a recent report from Merrill Lynch Bank of America argues something worse may be in store: a prolonged period of difficult relations with the U.S., which is still the world’s largest economy and biggest capital market.

America is the only country with the heft and apparent determination to block China’s rise, say the authors, Joseph P. Quinlan and Lauren J. Sanfilippo. Recessions come and go. Business cycles are, you know, cyclical. What they are talking about is something structural. And bear in mind: Even before President Donald Trump took office, China was already changing, with less focus on manufacturing, exports and public investment.

If you take seriously the idea that ties with China are unlikely to be the same again, and if you recognize that China has prospered by being part of the existing system, then you need to ask what the setup will look like without that. China would be less of an anchor for global growth, much less of a low-cost location for manufacturing. And next time a global slump hits, China would be less of a willing partner with a massive wallet. Any country with an economy of significance will need to rethink what its commercial ties with China look like.

This is all true whether or not Trump and the Chinese president strike a short-term truce. These big shifts don’t hinge on whether and when the yuan will drop to 7 per dollar, or whether the next U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods are 10 percent or 20 percent. Think bigger.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…