Skip to main content

The BRI in Pakistan: China’s flagship economic corridor



by Thomas S. Eder

The plans for an economic corridor between Pakistan and China preceded China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The project was first announced in the summer of 2013, when then-prime minister Nawaz Sharif met Chinese prime minister Li Keqiang in Beijing. The focus was on connecting China with the Chinese-invested Pakistani port of Gwadar through highway, rail and pipeline infrastructure. Project plans had a five-year horizon for implementation, and the sums involved – ranging between ten and twenty billion USD – were moderate compared to China’s current ambitions in Pakistan.

These activities were later reframed as part of the so-called “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor” (CPEC), which was only officially launched in April 2015 while China’s president Xi Jinping visited Pakistan. Emphasis shifted towards power generation in Pakistan, and estimated costs ballooned to 46 billion USD. The two governments then drew up a “Long Term Plan,” starting in 2017 and drastically expanding the projected timeline for implementation up to 2030. Projected costs moved up to 62 billion USD, and Pakistani officials have since mentioned even higher numbers.

CPEC projects (as listed on this Pakistan government website) constitute the bulk of BRI-related activities in Pakistan, and its stated goals align with those in China’s main BRI policy documents. CPEC, however, does not cover all joint Sino-Pakistani infrastructure efforts that can be seen as furthering BRI goals. CPEC projects, moreover, do not always involve China directly. In line with the methodology behind the MERICS Belt and Road Tracker, we have chosen to include non-CPEC projects when they fall within the range of BRI goals.

Power generation makes up bulk of projects

The map above displays a much larger part of the project categories included in the MERICS BRI database than our previous mappings, adding fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy power plants, as well as transmission lines, fiber optic cables, highways, airports and urban public transport. 

Although the idea of a transport corridor has been the focus of international attention, power generation makes up the bulk of already completed CPEC projects. If one includes projects implemented and/or financed by Beijing that have not been branded as part of CPEC, energy makes up an even larger share, with power plants accounting for over 90 percent of the cumulative total cost of projects. This fits the emphasis in “Phase I” of the “Long Term Plan” on addressing chronic electricity shortages – as a precondition for building up Pakistan’s industrial base as well as connectivity with China after 2020.  

Three years after the official launch of CPEC in 2015, the MERICS BRI database confirms the frequent description of CPEC as a “flagship project” of the BRI. Pakistan has absorbed the largest share of Chinese financing connected to completed projects. When including projects under construction, more than 15 billion USD of Chinese FDI and loans are tied up in relevant projects. 

Three main, and partly contradictory, motivations are behind this Chinese focus on Pakistan: aiding economic development to reduce support for separatist and Islamist militancy, stabilizing China’s military ally as a strategic counterweight to India in South Asia, and using Pakistan’s non-transparent procurement process and lack of alternative investors to maximize benefits for Chinese companies.

Business interests undermine development agenda

Firstly, the Chinese government is concerned about insurgency-fuelled instability in neighboring Pakistan. The goal is to keep militants from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region from finding support and training in the Pakistani-Afghan border regions, and to secure trade routes towards the Indian Ocean and the Middle East. Beijing’s stance is that its state-driven investment in such regions can improve the security environment through economic development.

Secondly, Pakistan remains useful for China as a check on its main regional geopolitical competitor in South Asia: India. Nuclear-armed, in part thanks to China, Pakistan acts as a buffer and counterweight in Sino-Indian border disputes, weakening China’s competitor by absorbing a lot of its attention. Taking this even further, Pakistan, China’s “all-weather” strategic partner for half a century, might even host the second overseas PLA Navy base besides Djibouti at Chinese-built port facilities in Gwadar.

The third objective risks undermining the first two. The BRI aims to support Chinese companies in gaining greater market share worldwide, and in offsetting slower growth in an increasingly saturated domestic market. Chinese companies already had a strong presence in Pakistan when the BRI was announced, and were then able to expand it without having to go through open tenders. More importantly, Chinese companies have often obtained long-term contractual rights to operate road and energy infrastructure and to collect electricity or toll fees at guaranteed high prices.

These high prices threaten to put Pakistan at a disadvantage compared to regional competitors like Bangladesh. Chinese investment could thus stunt Pakistan’s industrial growth and ultimately undermine the economic development China seeks to support for security and geopolitical reasons.

You can download a high resolution versionof the map here.


https://www.merics.org/en/bri-tracker/the-bri-in-pakistan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

Balochistan to establish first medical university

https://www.dawn.com/news/1366135

The Newspaper's Staff CorrespondentOctober 25, 2017QUETTA: The provincial cabinet on Tuesday approved the draft for establishing a medical university in Balochistan.Health minister Mir Rehmat Saleh Baloch made the announcement while speaking at a press conference after a cabinet meeting.“The cabinet has approved the draft of the medical university which would be presented in the current session of the Balochistan Assembly,” he said, adding with the assembly’s approval the Bolan Medical College would be converted into a medical university.Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2017

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…