Skip to main content



The Himalayan country’s pull-out from an army drill in India and its new-found access to China’s seaports represent a psychological victory over its southern neighbour, but real gains are still a long way off

Chinese President Xi Jinping meets Nepal Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli on his 2016 Beijing visit. Photo: EPA

The timing of a surprise decision by Nepal to withdraw from the first-ever joint military exercise in India – which comes exactly a week before a scheduled joint military exercise with China, and on the heels of a vital transit agreement with the Middle Kingdom – may have been merely coincidental, but is loaded with strategic meaning for the small country sandwiched between two regional giants.

On Saturday, Kathmandu let it be known that the Nepalese Army would not participate in the first-ever joint military exercise of the so-called BIMSTEC nations in India that started on September 10. The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, or BIMSTEC, is a regional bloc comprising Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Bhutan and Nepal.

Driven by India into China’s arms, is Nepal the new Sri Lanka?

The military drill, which follows a BIMSTEC summit of leaders in Kathmandu earlier this month, came under criticism in Nepal as it was said to have been sprung on the member countries – apparently there had been no discussion of the India-initiated proposal at the summit itself. In a parliamentary statement squarely aimed at India, Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Oli said Nepal would not join any military alliance, and would not deviate from its foreign policy based on non-alignment and peaceful coexistence.

India has been looking to develop a robust regional organisation excluding China and Pakistan. It is therefore strategically using BIMSTEC to project its power because the other regional bloc, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), has Pakistan as a member and China as an observer.

An Indian Army soldier in front of a group of People's Liberation Army soldiers in a 2016 anti-terror drill. Nepal has pulled out of a military exercise with India, but plans to conduct one with China. Photo: AFP

Nepal’s absence from the weeklong platoon-level joint military exercise in the western Indian city of Pune will be a major diplomatic setback for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has been trying to woo back Nepal after a punishing Indian blockade on the tiny Himalayan nation in 2015 strained relations between the two traditionally close countries, which share an open border and common culture.

Nepal and India cooperate closely on defence as their forces jointly man the 1,800km open border between the countries. India has been the major arms and ammunition provider for the Nepalese Army, and in a rare arrangement, Nepal’s army chief is an honorary general of the Indian Army and vice versa. Therefore, Nepal’s abrupt pull-out from the military drill may not immediately impact relations, but it will widen the cracks that have appeared between the two nations since the blockade.



Get updates direct to your inbox

By registering you agree to our T&Cs & Privacy Policy

Nepal leader vows to revive Chinese dam project, open to review pact over Nepalese soldiers in India

Exacerbating the situation is Nepal’s plan to conduct a joint military exercise with China from September 17 in Chengdu, the capital of southwestern Sichuan Province, in a bid to share experience in terrorism and disaster management. The BIMSTEC pull-out and joint drill follow a breakthrough agreement on transit and transport protocol between Nepal and China.

Since the 2015 Indian blockade, landlocked Nepal has been seeking alternative sea-access routes. The final agreement detailing China’s granting of access to four of its seaports – Tianjin, Shenzhen, Lianyungang, and Zhanjiang – and the three dry ports of Lanzhou, Lhasa and Xigatse, represents significant progress for Oli’s efforts to reduce Nepal’s dependence on India.

Nepal’s access to Chinese seaports such as Tianjin provide it with an alternative in the event of another Indian blockade. Photo: ImagineChina

The agreement was signed in 2016 when Oli visited Beijing soon after the Indian blockade, during which Nepal was thrown into a major crisis as supplies of vital goods such as oil and medicine were cut off. China and Nepal have since been negotiating the agreement’s details before its implementation, but there has been no significant progress. The negotiations gained pace only after Oli this year became prime minister for the second time; he has made rail and road connectivity one of his top priorities for Nepal, which joined China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” last year.

While access to Chinese seaports is a major achievement for Nepal that consolidates its independence and sovereignty, it is still more a diplomatic and psychological victory than a concrete economic gain, given the distance between Kathmandu and Chinese ports and Nepal’s poor connectivity with its northern neighbour.

As Oli comes calling, what does Nepal want from China?

Nepal still lacks all-weather roadways to Chinese transit points. The nearest Chinese port is over 3,500km from Kathmandu, whereas India’s Haldia port is only 1,200km away – and more than 70 per cent of Nepal’s trade transits through India. China is therefore hardly a substitute for India, but alternative sea access allows Nepal a lifeline in the event of more Indian blockades.

If implemented properly, the Chinese agreement will provide Nepal with more options, and hence confidence in dealing with India. The BIMSTEC military drill pull-out may well have been the first sign of the China-tempered steel that India might have to get used to while dealing with Nepal from now on as part of the changing geopolitical balance of the region.

Geja Sharma Wagle is a Kathmandu-based international and strategic affairs analyst


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…