Skip to main content

China hasn’t changed belt and road’s ‘predatory overseas investment model’, US official says

DIPLOMACY

China is just partnering with other countries on infrastructure projects ‘to grab their assets’, says US agency that oversees financing for international development

Owen ChurchillUPDATED : Thursday, 13 Sep 2018, 12:42PM

 133

The head of the US government’s international finance development agency has stepped up criticism of China’s overseas investment strategy, dismissing Beijing’s efforts to give it greater legitimacy by partnering with other countries on infrastructure projects and accusing China of being “in it to grab their assets”.

Pushing back against international criticism that China’s finance model is predatory and smothers recipient countries in debt they cannot pay, Chinese officials and state media have recently scrambled to play down the geopolitical nature of the “Belt and Road Initiative”, instead focusing on sustainable development and job creation for recipient economies.

But Ray Washburne, president and CEO of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) – an intergovernmental agency that channels US private capital into overseas development projects in the form of loans, funds and political insurance – said on Wednesday that China did not appear to be changing its modus operandi.

“I haven’t seen it,” Washburne said. “[China is] not in it to help countries out, they’re in it to grab their assets.”

Washburne made the remarks in a conversation with reporters at OPIC’s Washington headquarters, almost five years to the day that President Xi Jinping unveiled the “Belt and Road Initiative” – formerly “One Belt, One Road” – to build economic, political and cultural ties around Asia and beyond through state-led investment.

China pledges another US$60b to Africa as leaders meet in Beijing

Repeating criticism his agency has frequently directed towards Xi’s signature foreign policy initiative, Washburne said China was purposefully plunging recipient countries into debt, then going after “their rare earths and minerals and things like that as collateral for their loans”.

A spotlight fell on the so-called loan-to-own nature of some of China’s overseas infrastructure ventures in December when China acquired a major port in Sri Lanka after the island failed to repay the loans that had funded its construction.

In recent weeks, amid growing resistance from the global community and shortly after Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad announced the review of a number of China-backed infrastructure projects because of concerns about Malaysia’s national debt, Xi sought to quell criticism of the initiative, saying in a speech that it was not about creating a “China club”.

At a seminar on August 27, Xi said China needed to “prioritise the needs of the other party and implement projects that will benefit the local people”.

He also said the projects funded by the more than US$60 billion along the belt and road’s intercontinental route had led to the creation of more than 200,000 jobs.

In another apparent bid to bolster the initiative’s legitimacy in the eyes of the global community, Beijing is increasingly seeking partnerships with other countries, such as Japan, to co-fund infrastructure projects.

During a summit in May between Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, the two countries announced their intention to establish a committee through which ministries and agencies could discuss Sino-Japanese business cooperation in third-party countries.

Abe emphasised that Japanese involvement would be contingent on the adherence to international standards, including transparency and financial sustainability.

Along with Australia, Japan is one third of a trilateral agreement that OPIC is currently brokering to promote joint finance development projects in the Indo-Pacific region. OPIC has already signed separate memorandums of understanding with its Japanese and Australian counterparts.

Asked whether collaboration between Japan and China would jeapordise that agreement, Washburne dismissed the prospect of a substantive partnership between the two countries.

“I don’t see it really happening,” Washburne said.

Chinese firm told to suspend US$20 billion rail link in Malaysia

Japan is one of the countries concerned about growing Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific region, he said, adding that the two “are very competitive with each other over there”.

OPIC’s managing director of communications, Carol Danko, added that Japan’s adherence to international standards of finance development would make any partnership with China a challenge.

“China would have to match the standards of working with their partner,” she said. “I don’t think Japan would allow otherwise.”

OPIC had been earmarked for elimination by the Trump administration in an attempt to streamline the government. But lobbying – both from within the agency and from lawmakers concerned with the sprawling influence China is exerting through belt and road projects – has given the agency a lifeline.

If it passes, legislation awaiting US Senate approval would not only keep OPIC alive but increase its portfolio cap from US$30 billion to US$60 billion.

In addition, the “Better Utilisation of Investments Leading to Development Act of 2018” (BUILD Act) would give the agency authority to invest equity in development projects, instead of just providing loans.

China scores with Asean as US loses its way in South China Sea

Though concern about China’s aggressive lending model has fuelled OPIC’s survival, Washburne insisted that impeding Chinese investment would not be a direct criterion when considering future investment projects.

We’re not looking at something to say ‘Let’s go do something there to beat the Chinese there’,” he said. “It has to be a commercially viable project.”



https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/2163972/china-hasnt-changed-belt-and-roads-predatory-overseas

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…