Skip to main content

Trade war, day 40: ‘Zero-sum’ is the word

Supchina.com


For at least half a year now, China has regularly warned Donald Trump against taking a zero-sum view of U.S.-China trade. Last Friday, the Communist Party’s house newspaper, the People’s Daily, seemed to admit that the effort was futile. It complained (in Chinese) — among other things, which you can read about in SupChina Access — of a “zero-sum mentality” in the U.S., and that “no matter what China does, in the eyes of the United States, China's development has already ‘damaged the supremacy of the United States.’”

That’s partially right, as far as Trump, and the anger in America that he channels, is concerned. But the “zero-sum” accusation goes both ways.

“Americans felt that at least some of China’s success had come at their expense,” former commerce secretary Penny Pritzker writes in Bloomberg (paywall), and Trump is simply the first national politician to capitalize on that anger and actually carry through with aggressive policies toward China after being elected.“For years, Americans were told that China was a developing country and shouldn’t necessarily be held to the same standard as developed nations such as the U.S.” — and this blunted criticism of China’s economic policy when it violated WTO rules and protected and subsidized its domestic market. But “China’s success had severely undercut that line of reasoning,” and the “disconnect between words and reality [helped give] Trump his political resonance in the U.S.”“If China doesn’t change its approach to economic competition, I fear that today’s trade war will be nothing compared to the heightened tensions to come. Frankly, our domestic political system will demand action and President Trump will look like the mild first incarnation of a trend rather than an outlier,” Pritzker concludes.Abigail Grace, who helped craft policy toward China as part of the National Security Council as recently as half a year ago, writes in Foreign Policy (paywall), “The root of this problem is not the [trade] deficit, but China’s deeply held belief that it is not beholden to the same rules as other nations.”“Beijing’s zero-sum view of technological development” — by which Grace is referring, in part, to the Made in China 2025 initiative — is “likely to impair others seeking to climb the same ladder.” But “China remains committed to its own economic agenda because it believes that achieving technological supremacy today will enable it to write tomorrow’s rules.”

The Chinese Foreign Ministry today also accused the U.S. of a “zero-sum game mindset” in another area of policy: Taiwan. Read the ministry’s whole statement here.

This is in response to the signing of the National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA), a $716 billion spending bill, which states that “long-term strategic competition with China” is “a principal priority for the US,” the SCMP reports.“Defence and security cooperation with Taiwan” was prioritized in the bill, leading the Chinese Defense Ministry to reiterate, “We firmly oppose efforts by any country to develop any form of official or defense relationship with Taiwan,” the Wall Street Journal reports (paywall).Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wenhappens to be visiting the U.S. right now, where in Los Angeles, the SCMP notes, she “was given an unprecedentedly high level of courtesy, according to Taiwanese media.”For a detailed look at recent U.S. policy toward Taiwan, and an argument likely resonating in Washington that the U.S. should do more to bolster ties with Taiwan, see this piece by June Teufel Dreyer of the Foreign Policy Research Institute: The Big Squeeze: Beijing’s Anaconda Strategy to Force Taiwan to Surrender.

—Lucas Niewenhuis

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…