Skip to main content

Efforts needed to counter anti-CPEC propaganda

By Moneeb Ahmad Barlas Source:Global Times Published: 2018/8/15 20:43:40


Illustration: Luo Xuan/GT


US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has warned the IMF against providing Pakistan with a bailout package to rescue its fragile economy. US Secretary of Defense James Mattis has also voiced concerns about the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), saying that the corridor passes through so-called "disputed territory." US apprehensions about Pakistan-China relations in general and the CPEC in particular stem from strategic calculations based on the geopolitics of this region. 

The CPEC has the potential to be a game changer in international politics. It connects Kashgar in China's Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region to the southwestern Pakistani port of Gwadar in Balochistan province. Both countries have long sought to achieve security through development. The East Turkestan Islamic Movement has troubled China with secessionist activities in Xinjiang. The corridor is expected to usher in jobs and prosperity in the region while reducing the incentive for people to engage in subversive activities. Similarly, Balochistan has been a hotbed of terrorism in Pakistan. If the CPEC is implemented wisely and honestly, poverty-stricken Balochistan could benefit from infrastructure development and job creation, with more than $30 billion set to be invested in energy projects in Pakistan. In addition, if Pakistan receives a sizeable share of the profits generated at Gwadar Port, the country can build a sustainable economy and will not need further injections of aid. This creates a win-win situation for both countries, while also reducing Pakistan's dependence on the IMF.

But that runs contrary to what policymakers in Washington want. Pakistan holds immense strategic importance because of its location bordering Afghanistan in the north and the oil-rich Persian Gulf in the south. Whenever Pakistan refuses to heed US demands over strategic issues such as Afghanistan, the US wields international aid as a weapon. It either puts its aid on hold or at least reduces the amount being paid to Pakistan. Washington also makes it difficult for Pakistan to obtain IMF loans. Now, with the CPEC, Pakistan is experiencing a massive influx of Chinese investment and soft loans. Consequently, Islamabad is not only reducing its economic dependence on the US but is also depriving Washington of its coercive powers. The US dreads the idea of being replaced by China. Moreover, a troubled Xinjiang also suits US hegemonic designs. It keeps Beijing preoccupied with internal security problems, while reducing its capacity to exert its influence in international politics. Now that the CPEC is likely to overcome this internal security dilemma, Washington fears a more aggressive Chinese presence in the global arena. 

The US is increasingly militarizing the Asia Pacific region. In 2012, former defense secretary Leon Panetta revealed US plans to shift more than half its naval power to the region. India has also established a sophisticated naval base at Andaman Nicobar Islands in the Bay of Bengal. As China's major oil imports are routed through the Strait of Malacca, increased militarization of the region by Washington and New Delhi can be seen as a threat to China's seaborne trade. However, the CPEC offsets this dilemma as it bypasses the Strait of Malacca and provides Beijing with a shorter and safer alternative. In this way, the corridor deals another blow to US motives.

The CPEC facilitates intercontinental connectivity. It will link China with South Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe through a faster and shorter route. It will also provide landlocked Afghanistan and Central Asian states with access to the Persian Gulf. Hence, Beijing's economic and strategic clout is likely to expand over the entire globe. 

Evidently, this is a hard reality for the US to accept. This is why the US keeps whining about Pakistan-China ties. The US and its allies will use every possible means to sabotage the CPEC. Beijing and Islamabad can only respond with smooth and timely completion of the CPEC. In this regard, it is imperative for both countries to address the apprehensions surrounding the corridor.

The US and its allies have cashed in on the lack of information about the CPEC to spread misconceptions about China's intentions and the anticipated economic benefits for Pakistan. Western media reports have manufactured stories to discredit China's proactive trade and economic diplomacy, using slogans like "debt-trap diplomacy" and "predatory lending." And various measures are being taken to dissuade countries from trading with China. All this calls for a joint Pakistan-China diplomatic and media strategy to counter the hostile anti-CPEC propaganda.

The details of the agreements signed between Beijing and Islamabad need to be made public. Officials dealing with projects should be well prepared to take any questions concerning the CPEC at any domestic or international forum. Pakistan Television (PTV) and China Central Television (CCTV) can play important roles in educating the masses through joint production of documentaries and special reports on ongoing projects, highlighting their economic value and benefits for both countries. An informed and well-educated public would be less vulnerable to malicious propaganda. 

The author is an independent researcher in public policy and international relations based in Pakistan.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

China's Raise as a Maritime Power

China's Rise as a Maritime PowerOcean Policy from Mao Zedong to Xi JinpingTAKEDA Jun’ichiSenkaku IslandsApr 23, 2014 PDF Download1. IntroductionThe international community has been viewing China's recent moves relating to the seas as representing "maritime expansion," and the Chinese themselves have come to talk about making their country a maritime power. In the political report he delivered in the autumn of 2012 to the eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, which stands at the top of the country's power structure, General Secretary Hu Jintao declared, "We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, develop the marine economy, protect the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguard China's maritime rights and interests, and build China into a maritime power."1 This was Hu's final report as the top leader of the CPC; after delivering it he stepped down from his posts as general secretary and chairm…

Guardians of the Belt and Road

Guardians of the Belt and RoadThe internationalization of China's private security companiesby Helena Legarda and Meia NouwensFollowing the build-up of infrastructure and investment projects along China’s extensive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), private security companies from China are also increasingly going global – to protect Chinese assets and the growing number of Chinese nationals living and working in countries along the BRI, in sometimes unstable regions. Out of the 5,000 registered Chinese private security companies, 20 provide international services, employing 3,200 security personnel in countries like Iraq, Sudan and Pakistan.The impact of this newly developing Chinese activity abroad is analyzed in this MERICS China Monitor. Chinese private security companies’ international activities pose a challenge to European interests as they are often largely unregulated and their security staff are often inexperienced in dealing with serious conflict situations and combat. EU …