Skip to main content

China's Belt and Road Initiative and the Geopolitics of Infrastructure

By

 Matthew Tallmer
August 20, 2018

The book on the Belt and Road Initiative – a Chinese government plan to build infrastructure such as fiber optic cables, ports, railways, and highways along a 21st-century version of the historic Silk Road – was literally written nearly a decade ago.

“The Ultimate Weapon is No Weapon: Human Security and New Rules of War and Peace,” a 2010 book by the late Lt. Col. Shannon Beebe, a West Point graduate who helped form AfriCom, the U.S Military Command for Africa, and Mary Kaldor, a professor and director of Center for the Study of Global Governance at the London School of Economics and Political Science, argued that the root causes of terrorism, armed and internal conflict were poverty, disease, health, inadequate sanitation and water supplies, discrimination and the effects of climate change. Beebe and Kaldor said that in order to achieve national and international security, Western nations needed to address and solve those problems.  (In the spirit of full disclosure, I should mention that Shannon Beebe was killed in a 2011 private plane crash along with Liz Pignatello. Both were close friends.)

U.S. Defense Secretary Mattis seems to agree with Beebe and Kaldor. Mattis testified before Congress that climate change is a national security threat. In an apparent bow toward human security, Mattis famously told Congress “If you don’t fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately,” the implication being that diplomacy and international aid can act as an adjunct to defense and a deterrent to war.

Joel Wuthnow, a research fellow at the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs at the U.S National Defense University, testified before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission, that by [f]ostering infrastructure development and regional economic connectivity,” BIR “can help address the roots of instability by lifting neighboring populations out of poverty.” That is a view shared by Chinese government officials, including the head of the Central Bank, the functional equivalent of the Federal Reserve, and a former ambassador.

A recent article in The Economist cited an analysis of BRI written by Peter Cai, the group chief advisory for Virgin Australia who was an economics journalist at major financial publications, which quoted the former Chinese ambassador to Pakistan as having said that BRI aims to solve security issues: “The best medicine is to address the terrorism problem the is through tackling the incubator of terrorism, mainly poverty.” Cai also wrote in his analysis for the Lowery Institute for International Policy, an Australian policy think tank, that the head of the Chinese Central Bank said BRI would bring China both “economic and national security dividends.”

Jonathan Hillman, a China scholar, testified before the commission that a goal of BRI was to “strengthen hard infrastructure with new roads and railways.” He testified that BRI “has focused on transportation projects: road, railroads, seaports, and dry ports” and that it “will expand in the future to include power plants, pipelines, telecommunications, and other connectivity infrastructure.”

Beebe told me that, while a Senior Africa Analyst for the Army’s deputy chief of staff for intelligence, he was tasked with determining what African military and civilian leaders needed to ensure security. Beebe said that, to a person, the leaders did not need weapons or American soldiers on the ground, rather they needed infrastructure improvements, such as water and sewage systems, roads, electrification, and medical facilities.

During his service in Iraq, Beebe says the key indicator of the attitude to U.S. forces among Iraqi civilians was whether the Army Corps of Engineers or the Navy’s construction battalions had built infrastructure. Where they had, the civilians were likely to welcome U.S. forces and see them as them as friends; where they had not, civilians viewed them as an occupying force and worked with Jihadist.

Three years before the launch of BRI and shortly before his death, Beebe told me said that time and time again he saw China undertake massive infrastructure developments. I distinctly remember his complaint that everywhere he looked in Africa he saw a road or a water pipeline or a sewer or a hospital that had been built by China.

Beebe warned that, unless the U.S. and our allies devoted the same resources into infrastructure development as the Chinese did, we risked repeating the same mistake we had made in Iraq and elsewhere: If we did not provide adequate human security, another nation would and that effectively turn our allies into potential adversaries.

He said he had made that point in briefings with senior military officials, at defense seminars, and in his book. I do not know whether people in the Pentagon absorbed his lectures, understood the briefing, or read his book, but there is no public indication that they acted on it. And that could turn out to be a national security blunder of monumental proportions.


https://www.roughlyexplained.com/2018/08/chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-and-the-geopolitics-of-infrastructure/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

Balochistan to establish first medical university

https://www.dawn.com/news/1366135

The Newspaper's Staff CorrespondentOctober 25, 2017QUETTA: The provincial cabinet on Tuesday approved the draft for establishing a medical university in Balochistan.Health minister Mir Rehmat Saleh Baloch made the announcement while speaking at a press conference after a cabinet meeting.“The cabinet has approved the draft of the medical university which would be presented in the current session of the Balochistan Assembly,” he said, adding with the assembly’s approval the Bolan Medical College would be converted into a medical university.Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2017