Skip to main content

The Belt and Road Initiative - From the Perspective of Overseas Direct Investments

The Belt and Road Initiative - From the Perspective of Overseas Direct Investments

The infrastructure-led initiative, China's leaders believe, could create new markets for Chinese companies and provide a boost for struggling banks and state-owned enterprises.

Karen LiuMar 25, 2018 5:05 AM  WST

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) - officially known as the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road policy - is a development strategy proposed in 2013 by the Chinese government that aims to create the world's largest platform for economic cooperation, including policy coordination, trade and financing collaboration, and social and cultural cooperation. The main focuses are in infrastructure, transportation, and energy.

The Initiative was launched at a critical point in China's economic transformation.

In recent years, China has gone through structural transformation and is faced with domestic production overcapacity. By helping many developing Asian countries that lack the capacity to undertake major infrastructure projects on their own, China might soak up some of the overcapacity in the industrial sector and could even boost the domestic economy with demand abroad. The infrastructure-led initiative, China's leaders believe, could create new markets for Chinese companies and at the same time, provide a shot in the arm to the struggling banks and state-owned enterprises.

Therefore, when we want to evaluate the performance of The Belt and Road Initiative, the performance of Chinese companies with overseas direct investment (ODI) in the belt-road countries is a vital gauge to measure. Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? Du and Zhang answer the question in their 2017 paper in the China Economic Review.

Market and Regime Suggest Yes

Intuitively they think the answer is yes for two reasons. First is from the market's perspective. The BRI strategy's massive investment in infrastructure would improve the quality and availability of logistics facilities in the belt-road countries, which creates conditions for the foreign direction investment (FDI) inflow from China. The improved infrastructure can also raise trade flows, which can in turn indirectly promote China's ODI in the belt-road countries. Furthermore, the high-level international political cooperation, policy coordination, and government support embedded in the One Belt One Road initiative can considerably reduce host country policy uncertainties and political risks for Chinese firms investing in the belt-road countries, which further encourages China's ODI in the belt-road countries.

Second is from the regime's perspective. China is characterized with state capitalism under an authoritarian regime. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) play a pivotal role in the commanding heights of the national economy, and they are the reliable forces to achieve government goals. In contrast, a vibrant private sector makes up the majority of the production of national output and employment. Disadvantaged in gaining access to resources, such as capital, land, etc., non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) are typically willing to cooperate with local or national authorities. They tend to follow the call of the government in fulfilling various national or local goals. Thus, enterprises in China might respond actively to increase ODI. Examining how Chinese enterprises respond to this national economic strategy can help shed light on the mechanisms of implementation of the national strategy.

In Du and Zhang's paper, they further disentangle the concept of ODI into greenfield investment and merger and acquisitions (M&As).

Acquisitions vs. Greenfields

They find that the Chinese overseas acquisitions of targets in the belt-road countries increased considerably in the years following the announcement of the BRI national strategy (years 2014 and 2015), but the greenfield investment in the belt-road countries was growing at a slower pace than acquisitions in the belt-road countries and greenfield investments in the non-belt-road countries. There are signs that Chinese investment firms shifted a portion of ODI from greenfield investment to acquisitions in the post-BRI years to capture the investment opportunities more quickly.

Chinese ODI Amounts in the Belt-Road Countries: 

M&A versus greenfield investment. (Source: Du and Zhang, 2017)

In terms of acquisition target industries, energy and power and industrials still remained as the top two in the belt-road countries in the post-strategy years, but the importance of high technology and financials rose rather quickly, occupying the third and fourth positions. This is largely consistent with the trend of industrial diversification in the overall structure of target industries of China's overseas acquisitions.

The Belt-Road Countries: Top 5 Sectors  

before and after the policy announcement. (Source: Du and Zhang, 2017)

Du and Zhang also pay attention to the overseas acquisition activities of SOEs and non-SOEs. Both SOEs and non-SOEs, relative to their counterparts from other major acquirer countries, increased significantly in the two post-BRI years. Strikingly, SOEs played a leading part in acquisitions in infrastructure sectors in the belt-road countries. A large chunk of these acquisitions could be part of the infrastructure investment plan embedded in the BRI initiative. Non-SOEs were particularly active in acquiring targets in non-infrastructure sectors in the belt-road countries, probably encouraged by the expected improvements in infrastructure, expected free trade policy arrangements, expected government policy coordination, and political cooperation, etc.

Their close look at the destination countries of China's overseas acquisitions demonstrates that Central and West Asia, Western Europe, and Russia are favorable destinations of Chinese ODI in the belt-road countries. It is likely that the expected improvement in infrastructure following SOEs' ODI in those regions encouraged non-SOEs to expand into the non-infrastructure sectors there.

Du and Zhang's study demonstrates that the Belt and Road Initiative, an infrastructure-led economic integration blueprint implemented under an authoritarian regime, prompted Chinese enterprises to expand their ODI in the belt-road countries. The BRI strategy is just unfolding, and we might expect more in next five years.

Reference: Du, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? China Economic Review.


Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…