Skip to main content

‘Proactive diplomacy’ in Mekong River dispute only way to resolve brewing conflict

http://m.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2128079/proactive-diplomacy-mekong-river-dispute-only-way

OPINION

Richard Heydarian writes that more platforms like the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation system are needed to quell dissent in Asia’s other major water war

Richard HeydarianUPDATED : Sunday, 14 Jan 2018, 2:17PM

For years, territorial disputes in the South China Sea have dominated Southeast Asia’s security agenda.

The ferocity of rows over vital sea lines carrying up to a third of global trade valued at US$5 trillion annually has embittered relations between China and some Southeast Asian claimant states. Meanwhile, external powers such as the United States have jumped into the fray, seeking to keep China’s maritime ambitions in check.

While the prevailing narrative tends to be that the South China Sea increasingly has become the main theatre of hegemonic competition between superpowers, this view tends to miss Asia’s other brewing water conflict in the Mekong Delta. Decades down the road, this area could be an even more explosive flashpoint than the South China Sea.

Up to 60 million people in the Mekong basin directly depend on the river for water consumption, fisheries resources and mineral-rich soil.

But the broader issue is ensuring food and water security for Indochinese nations, some of which, namely Vietnam and Thailand, are among the world’s biggest producers of food staples such as rice. The dispute involves China and the Southeast Asian states of Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Myanmar and Laos.

It is a classic case of upstream versus downstream nations. The conflict is not too dissimilar from aquatic squabbles between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile River in Africa and between Turkey and Iraq over the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in West Asia.

 

SCMP TODAY: INTL EDITION

Get updates direct to your inbox

By registering you agree to our T&Cs & Privacy Policy

At the dispute’s heart is the dam-building bonanza among littoral states – China and Laos in particular – which has downstream nations on the verge of panic.

For Laos, the dam-building spree, including the Don Sahong and the much larger Xayaburi projects, is aimed at transforming the country into the “battery of Southeast Asia”. The poverty-stricken nation, which has limited domestic energy consumption, hopes to generate surplus electricity for export.

Is Mekong River set to become the new South China Sea for regional disputes?

China’s strategic and development goals include developing poorer southern regions such as the Yunnan province to arrest the growing inequality between China’s prosperous coast and its interior.

China also seeks to improve energy security as its manufacturing base matures and hyper-consumerism sets in. Hydroelectric power is seen as a more environmentally friendly alternative to coal power plants, a major source of concern in the country’s industrialised regions.

Down the road, the Mekong River area could be an even more explosive flashpoint than the South China Sea

To the world’s second-largest economy, the powerful upper Mekong, known as Lancang Jiang in China, is a tantalising source of clean energy. So far, China has completed six large-scale dams in the area, collectively producing about 15,000 megawatts per year. This output is more than sufficient to support cities with as many as 2 million residents.

But many more are to come. Manwan, the first of as many as 28 Chinese dams under consideration, was built back in 1995. The Mekong already hosts up to 11 major dam projects, many of which already are operating, with 30 more spread across its tributaries.

Moreover, China aims to transform the river into a major navigational channel flowing all the way into the South China Sea, much of which the country claims as part of its ancestral heritage. It plans to demolish around 15 small-sized land features spread across the river under the rubric of “navigation channel improvement” mainly for commercial vessels weighing up to 500 tonnes.

These projects are raising alarm across the region. Excessive dam building has, according to some observers, negatively affected fisheries stocks. It also has transformed the predictability of water flow and its availability in places such as the Tonle Sap, the region’s largest freshwater lake, and the downstream movement of silt for fertilising agricultural lands.

Chinese dams blamed for exacerbating Southeast Asian drought

Ultimately, tens of millions of Indochinese could be at risk of regular droughts, declining agricultural productivity and diminishing fisheries resources.

Absent effective diplomatic solutions, the region also could see heightened geopolitical tensions, even direct conflict. As climate change proves disruptive across agricultural Asia, resource competition and water wars could take an even more vicious turn.

This is precisely why littoral states should support multilateral diplomatic efforts to peacefully manage the disputes. The 1996 agreement on cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong basin, signed among Southeast Asian littoral states, provides a framework for institutionalised cooperation.

The agreement stipulates that parties should refrain from unilateral activities which imperil the rights and developmental interests of neighbours and undermine the area’s ecological sustainability. But much remains to be done.

Five things to know about the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation summit

The establishment of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation mechanism, which involves China and Southeast Asian littoral states, is a step in the right direction. It provides a much-needed platform for all parties to arrest the brewing conflict and adopt necessary mitigation and adaptation measures for affected communities. Proactive diplomacy is the only way forward.

Richard Heydarian is a Manila-based academic and author

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSG Commando Muddassir Iqbal of Pakistan Army

“ Commando Muddassir Iqbal was part of the team who conducted Army Public School operation on 16 December 2014. In this video he reveals that he along with other commandos was ordered to kill the innocent children inside school, when asked why should they kill children after killing all the terrorist he was told that it would be a chance to defame Taliban and get nation on the side. He and all other commandos killed children and later Taliban was blamed.
Muddassir Iqbal has deserted the military and now he is  with mujahedeen somewhere in AF PAK border area”
For authenticity of  this tape journalists can easy reach to his home town to interview his family members or   ISPR as he reveals his army service number”
Asalam o Alaikum: My name is Muddassir Iqbal. My father’s name is Naimat Ali. I belong to Sialkot divison (Punjab province), my village is Shamsher Poor and district, tehsil and post office  Narowal. Unfortunately I was working in Pakistan army. I feel embarrassed to tell you …

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…