Skip to main content

Lessons for India From the Rift in US-Pakistan Relations

What lessons can India draw from recent U.S. moves against Pakistan?

By Nitin Pai and Pranay Kotasthane

January 06, 2018

In April 2016, former U.S. ambassador to India, Robert Blackwill described the U.S. policy paralysis towards Pakistan in these evocative words:

…every time a new administration in Washington comes to office, they get worried about Pakistan, which has a stockpile of nuclear weapons. The (U.S.) Secretary of State then visits Pakistan and meets the top leadership. He is systematically lied to by Pakistan’s leadership, and this goes on for about two years. In the third year, he tells his colleagues at the U.S. State Department that Pakistan’s leaders have been lying to him. Then they think about how to deal with the situation, and the elections come in and a new administration takes charge. The same thing is (then) repeated.

This vicious rent-seeking cycle through which Pakistan has managed to bewilder many previous U.S. administrations seems to be unraveling now. Trump’s tweet putting Pakistan in the dock was quickly backed up by an administration announcement that it would suspend nearly all security aid to Pakistan. The New York Times also said that this suspension is a complete freeze, and does not involve diversion to non-military uses, as was the case in many previous suspensions. In a separate move, the U.S. has placed Pakistan on a special watch list for severe violations of religious freedom.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

The obvious first question then is, what is driving this policy change? The fact that Pakistan has indulged in ‘duplicitous policies’ and ‘double games’ over Afghanistan is a fifteen-year old story that hitherto failed to prevent U.S. from handing ransom money to Pakistan. The frustration has a role to play but is not sufficient by itself to cause a major policy change on Pakistan. In addition, there is another important factor: the China-Pakistan combine. Growing Chinese influence over Pakistan and in the Indian Ocean is causing the U.S. to reassess its policy towards Pakistan. Seen from this frame of balancing China, there are two mutually exclusive strategic calculations that can help understand U.S. policy reversal.

The first logic is one of strategic bargain. The U.S. is trying to flex its economic muscles to impress upon Pakistan that embracing China will have serious repercussions. The aim of this strategy then is to ensure that Pakistan falls back into the US-Saudi Arabia alliance. If Pakistan responds positively to the U.S. pressure, by way of agreeing to send troops to Yemen for example, it will be back in the good books of the US. The cycle that Robert Blackwill spoke about will resume after a minor operational glitch.

The alternative logic is one of rebuff. If the U.S. perceives that Pakistan has reached a point of no return with regards to its embrace of China, walking away from Pakistan’s rent-seeking becomes easier. In such a case, Washington’s focus would instead be on reducing the effectiveness of the China-Pakistan combine.

How does this affect India?

If the U.S. is following the first logic of strategy, then it is business as usual for India. But if the U.S. is rebuffing Pakistan, India is better placed for two reasons. One, this would mean that China will get mired in Pakistan’s domestic problems further. This closeness between two different worldviews will bring out friction points that have only been minor irritants up to now. Two, this would also mean that the U.S. will be a more willing partner for India given the common adversarial combine that these two states face.

Hence, even if the U.S. is following the logic of strategic bargain, India must attempt to create conditions that can bring the logic of rebuff to the forefront. India’s position on the Belt & Road initiative holds it in good stead. A difficult but interesting opportunity is if India can help support the supply chain of the NATO Forces in Afghanistan by utilising its friendly relationships with Iran or Central Asian States.

Finally, a point of concern for India should be that whatever might be the drivers of the Trump administration’s policy position, the reduced capacity of the State department—caused due to ‘draconian’ budget cuts and a dismissive attitude toward the diplomatic community—will constrain the implementation and outcomes.

Nitin Pai and Pranay Kotasthane are with the Takshashila Institution, a centre for research and education in public policy


Popular posts from this blog

Balochistan to establish first medical university

The Newspaper's Staff CorrespondentOctober 25, 2017QUETTA: The provincial cabinet on Tuesday approved the draft for establishing a medical university in Balochistan.Health minister Mir Rehmat Saleh Baloch made the announcement while speaking at a press conference after a cabinet meeting.“The cabinet has approved the draft of the medical university which would be presented in the current session of the Balochistan Assembly,” he said, adding with the assembly’s approval the Bolan Medical College would be converted into a medical university.Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2017

China’s 'Digital Silk Road': Pitfalls Among High Hopes

Will information and communication technologies help China realize its Digital Silk Road?By Wenyuan WuNovember 03, 2017In his speech at the opening ceremony of China’s 19th Party Congress, President Xi Jinping depicted China as a model of scientific and harmonious development for developing nations. Xi’s China wants to engage the world through commerce but also through environmental protection and technological advancement. This includes Beijing’s efforts to fight climate change with information and communication technologies (ICTs) that it plans to export along its “One Belt One Road” initiative (OBOR). Xi may have ambitious plans, but could China be throwing up obstacles in its own way?In his speech, the Chinese president emphasized the need to modernize the country’s environmental protections. The Chinese state is taking an “ecological civilization” approach to development and diplomacy, with a natio…

Germany’s Siemens sets up Belt and Road office in Beijing
Germany’s Siemens sets up Belt and Road office in Beijingby Janne Suokas Mar 23, 2018 15:20 TRADEINVESTMENTBELT AND ROAD INITIATIVEGerman industrial and engineering group Siemens will set up a Belt and Road office in Beijing. surberFlickrCC BY 2.0
German industrial and engineering group Siemens will set up an office in Beijing to boost international cooperation under China’s Belt and Road initiative, the company said on Friday.The move will help strengthen Siemens’ cooperation with Chinese and international companies and expand business opportunities brought about by the Belt and Road initiative, according to the company’s statement.The Belt and Road initiative is China’s ambitious project to boost trade and infrastructure investment in more than 65 countries along the ancient Silk Road trade routes from Asia to Europe and Africa.Siemens said it had already partnered with hundreds of Chinese companies in overse…