Skip to main content

The United States and ASEAN: The Key to the South China Sea Conflict

http://www.iar-gwu.org/content/united-states-and-asean-key-south-china-sea-conflict

By Anushka Kapahi
Staff Writer
6 October 2017

United States interests in the South China Sea (SCS) are diverse and chief among them is freedom of navigation. More than half of the global merchant fleet tonnage, and a third of all maritime traffic worldwide, passthrough the South China Sea. It serves as a massive global sea route that accounts for $1.2 trillion U.S. trade annually.

Freedom of navigation, in the SCS, therefore, is vital to the advancement of U.S. economic interests. China’s claims over a wide area of the SCS, and the building of artificial islands and military bases threaten those interests and need to be addressed through a comprehensive policy that preserves and protects American interests without escalating current tensions. The United States should further its naval presence, surveillance, and patrols in the region in response to an invitation from its allies among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states.

An increased naval presence supports several U.S. policy goals. First, freedom of navigation advances international commerce and trade activities in the Southeast Asian region. Second, it prevents China from frustrating the ability of the U.S. to project power and maintain a strong presence in this strategically vital maritime domains. Third, because the United States is responding to a request from ASEAN, China cannot frame an increase in the U.S. presence as outside interference or aggression.

Moreover, this policy signals strong support for stability and the rule of law. Freedom of navigation, surveillance, and peaceful U.S. military presence in the SCS assures Southeast Asian allies of support, promotes the peaceful resolution of maritime and territorial disputes, and encourages all parties to abide by international law. A strong U.S. presence will bolster the existing Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling in favor of the Philippines, which is an integral part of international law despite Chinese rejection.

In support of this policy, the United States should prioritize the development of trade agreements with the Southeast Asian states. A mutually beneficial agreement between the United States and ASEAN will give the United States increased leverage over China and add to international pressure in opposition to China building artificial islands in international waters contrary to international law.

Some say the U.S. has bigger problems in Asia. They point to North Korea, and say we should let the countries in the SCS work it out on their own, or we risk provoking a direct U.S.-China clash. They are mistaken. The SCS is a platform that increases distrust between China and the United States. Restoring a strong U.S. naval presence in the SCS will establish a new baseline, enhancing U.S. interests with China across the board, including our ability to deal with the situation in North Korea. We cannot delay. We cannot risk Chinese escalation in the SCS. We should act to counterbalance China now.

The United States can gain further advantage over Chinese growing dominance in the region by working with the Southeast Asian states. A stronger U.S. naval presence in the region in response to an ASEAN invitation will ensure freedom of navigation and assure Southeast Asian allies of U.S. support. A stronger U.S. naval presence will deter Chinese expansion and promote the peaceful resolution of territorial and maritime disputes. A stronger U.S. naval presence will preserve and protect security and promote regional prosperity and peace.

* * *

Anushka Kapahi is a first-year master's candidate studying International Affairs at the Elliott School at George Washington University. She is also a research associate at the NESA-Center for Strategic Studies

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CPEC Jobs in Pakistan, salary details

JOBS...نوکریاں چائنہ کمپنی میںPlease help the deserving persons...Salary:Salary package in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in these 300,000 jobs shall be on daily wages. The details of the daily wages are as follows;Welder: Rs. 1,700 dailyHeavy Duty Driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyMason: Rs. 1,500 dailyHelper: Rs. 850 dailyElectrician: Rs. 1,700 dailySurveyor: Rs. 2,500 dailySecurity Guard: Rs. 1,600 dailyBulldozer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyConcrete mixer machine operator: Rs. 2,000 dailyRoller operator: Rs. 2,000 dailySteel fixer: Rs. 2,200 dailyIron Shuttering fixer: Rs. 1,800 dailyAccount clerk: Rs. 2,200 dailyCarpenter: Rs. 1,700 dailyLight duty driver: Rs. 1,700 dailyLabour: Rs. 900 dailyPara Engine mechanic: Rs. 1,700 dailyPipe fitter: Rs. 1,700 dailyStorekeeper: Rs. 1,700 dailyOffice boy: Rs. 1,200 dailyExcavator operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyShovel operator: Rs. 2,200 dailyComputer operator: Rs. 2,200 dailySecurity Supervisor: Rs. 2,200 dailyCook for Chinese food: Rs. 2,000 dailyCook…

Balochistan to establish first medical university

https://www.dawn.com/news/1366135

The Newspaper's Staff CorrespondentOctober 25, 2017QUETTA: The provincial cabinet on Tuesday approved the draft for establishing a medical university in Balochistan.Health minister Mir Rehmat Saleh Baloch made the announcement while speaking at a press conference after a cabinet meeting.“The cabinet has approved the draft of the medical university which would be presented in the current session of the Balochistan Assembly,” he said, adding with the assembly’s approval the Bolan Medical College would be converted into a medical university.Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2017

The Rise of China-Europe Railways

https://www.csis.org/analysis/rise-china-europe-railways

The Rise of China-Europe RailwaysMarch 6, 2018The Dawn of a New Commercial Era?For over two millennia, technology and politics have shaped trade across the Eurasian supercontinent. The compass and domesticated camels helped the “silk routes” emerge between 200 and 400 CE, and peaceful interactions between the Han and Hellenic empires allowed overland trade to flourish. A major shift occurred in the late fifteenth century, when the invention of large ocean-going vessels and new navigation methods made maritime trade more competitive. Mercantilism and competition among Europe’s colonial powers helped pull commerce to the coastlines. Since then, commerce between Asia and Europe has traveled primarily by sea.1Against this historical backdrop, new railway services between China and Europe have emerged rapidly. Just 10 years ago, regular direct freight services from China to Europe did not exist.2 Today, they connect roughly 35 Chinese…